124668 pts · March 13, 2021
As my mom says “and I am unanimous in that!”
You’re not tho. Basic food safety is that if you touch ANYTHING that is not a food contact surface you change gloves. Worked in place that was SUPER strict about that and can’t pay attention to food workers now or I want to vomit as most food safety is theater. They’ll touch their phone, their hair/hat, their glasses, their clothes and then go right back to touching food w/o changing gloves.
Already running on trans issues and making it a wedge issue because that’s what they did in 2024 and it worked. So either a) progressives stop being petulant children who need a perfect candidate before they show up to the polls (which again isn’t likely) or b) you play to the center and hope that your message gets thro the noise and the centrists believe that you are with them on the social issues.
Because progressives are notorious for not being reliable voters (see every election 2010 - 2024) while “centrists” (aka Repub lite) are reliable voters (ie they show up almost every election). And centrists will look for any reason to not vote for someone - eg if Talarico would maintain the stance he had, that would be enough to say “well, he wants boys to be mutilated and in girls sports so I guess I have to vote for the opposition because I don’t want men in girls sports”. And Repubs are/
Has already happened. So no - I don’t give a fuck that some maga farmer is gonna lose their shirt.
They won’t admit they messed up because they don’t actually think they did. As for whether or not I think private equity / large corporate farms are going to do a better job - you need to define that term. Because to me, if a farm has more than 100k acres, is staffed primarily by hired (ie non-family) people - it’s a corporate farm. And those are way more common than a “family” farm. And those corporate farms are selling to 1 or 2 major clearing houses - so what you think is going to happen/1
Hate to break it to ya but the worlds moved on - we’re never getting back to what most people consider to be a “normal” relationship w the rest of the world.
And think that a state run Medicare “for all” program is going to be able to be administered just like Medicaid is - with the state being able to decide who gets coverage and who doesn’t. Which isn’t Medicare for all.
If they’re opposed to Medicare for all at the federal but not state level they’re opposed to Medicare for all because states typically don’t have enough state level revenue to support a Medicare for all system (which either they know and are being disingenuous, or are too uninformed / stupid to realize). I know this because states don’t have enough state level revenue to support Medicaid (states get funding from the federal government for Medicaid). Or they don’t actually want Medicare for all/1
That seems like a thing that you should just get for yourself.
It’s cute you think a magat farmer is gonna get convinced of anything. A dem could walk in drenched and tell them it’s raining and they wouldn’t believe it. A repub could walk in dusty af and tell them it’s a torrential downpour and they’d buy it.
“Going up”
But you don’t get to the upper levels without establishing the foundation - and if you’re not willing to put in the work for a solid foundation then there’s 0 reason to value your opinion.
Can pull the codes from my OBD2 port - I can even google them and get a GENERAL idea of wtf is going on. But even then it’s still just a best guess - which is not even close to the best guess of someone w experience behind them. Part of learning is learning that - especially early on - your opinion doesn’t mean shit, and that being open to the expertise of others doesn’t mean you’re stupid.
Classes are able to use a common language and have at least the basic understanding of the topic. Tbh when I was teaching I didn’t gaf about what some thought about the subject in the 101 courses because they didn’t know enough about the subject to have a valid opinion on anything. And yes - this applies to any topic - eg im not an auto mechanic. My opinion on what is causing the noise in my car doesn’t (and shouldn’t) hold as much weight as someone who is a mechanic. Sure I/2
It really depends on what level of course you’re taking. A 101 class is going to be a lot of learning foundational things / history of the science. Unfortunately there’s not a lot of area open to discussion - especially not if there’s 100+ students in the class. At about 300/400 is where you start having discussions about why things are theorized to be the way they are for a couple of reasons: 1) classes are smaller, so a lot easier to have in depth discussions, and 2) most people in those/1
Bs. Harris presented a plan that would have extended the infrastructure bill AND the CHIPS act and provided plenty of well paying jobs to people in the trades - as well as plenty of other jobs. All you had to do was pay attention for more than 5 seconds.
Get fleas.
Good. Then this probably wasn’t directed at you or the people you know. But tbh I’d wonder why, if what you say is true, you read “a majority of the military support Trump” and felt the need to say “not me!!!” - if I gave a shit. Which I don’t. Cuz people that read about how shitty a group that they choose to associate with is and feels the need to say “not me!!” usually identifies with that group even tho the group is shitty. As the old saying goes - if you lie down with dogs, you’re gonna/1
Sure. But voting is still private in the military. And a clear majority of vets will publicly state that they support him. So unless your argument is that they’re doing a 180 shift upon leaving the military your arguments don’t really hold up.
Idk…Repubs have some really fucking weird fetishes. I’m sure there’s a sizable majority that got hard / aroused when that scent hit their nostrils - some close enough may have shot their load.
Ya. But usually it’s funny.
I’d say it was shocking that people believe him but tbh it’s really not. It’s actually really pathetic at this point.
I mean it worked in 2024. Gotta have something to woo the minorities back (who tend to be more socially conservative) and Gen Z males are gonna see the same shit they saw in 2024 about how women will come crawling back to them on their knees just begging to suck them off and be their good little barefoot side piece homemaker.
Markets are selling off - high fed rate means higher borrowing costs (which means less profit and less returns on stock).
The only thing dropping precipitously is the stock market. Down 1000pts in the past 2 days as of 2p mst. Doubt we’ll see a dead cat bounce tomorrow either - but I could be wrong. Investors know what high diesel costs mean - high shipping costs, high wholesale costs, and high consumer prices = high inflation (btw we’re just now getting the price increases from the last oil spike at the consumer level). Given the decent jobs numbers all the signs point to rate increases by the Fed. Which is why/1
They looked at the US southern / plains states and thought to themselves “that abject poverty and lack of functioning social services looks like a good idea”.
It’s the name they picked for themselves and it identifies the group I’m talking about.
It’s not all that won them in 24. Progressives helped a lot by staying home. But it was a big reason.
If the whole trans athlete bs didn’t win for them in 2024 they wouldn’t be reprising the tactic. The goal is to get minorities (who trend socially conservative) to ignore their current circumstances. And history suggests that it’ll work.
As my mom says “and I am unanimous in that!”
You’re not tho. Basic food safety is that if you touch ANYTHING that is not a food contact surface you change gloves. Worked in place that was SUPER strict about that and can’t pay attention to food workers now or I want to vomit as most food safety is theater. They’ll touch their phone, their hair/hat, their glasses, their clothes and then go right back to touching food w/o changing gloves.
Already running on trans issues and making it a wedge issue because that’s what they did in 2024 and it worked. So either a) progressives stop being petulant children who need a perfect candidate before they show up to the polls (which again isn’t likely) or b) you play to the center and hope that your message gets thro the noise and the centrists believe that you are with them on the social issues.
Because progressives are notorious for not being reliable voters (see every election 2010 - 2024) while “centrists” (aka Repub lite) are reliable voters (ie they show up almost every election). And centrists will look for any reason to not vote for someone - eg if Talarico would maintain the stance he had, that would be enough to say “well, he wants boys to be mutilated and in girls sports so I guess I have to vote for the opposition because I don’t want men in girls sports”. And Repubs are/
Has already happened. So no - I don’t give a fuck that some maga farmer is gonna lose their shirt.
They won’t admit they messed up because they don’t actually think they did. As for whether or not I think private equity / large corporate farms are going to do a better job - you need to define that term. Because to me, if a farm has more than 100k acres, is staffed primarily by hired (ie non-family) people - it’s a corporate farm. And those are way more common than a “family” farm. And those corporate farms are selling to 1 or 2 major clearing houses - so what you think is going to happen/1
Hate to break it to ya but the worlds moved on - we’re never getting back to what most people consider to be a “normal” relationship w the rest of the world.
And think that a state run Medicare “for all” program is going to be able to be administered just like Medicaid is - with the state being able to decide who gets coverage and who doesn’t. Which isn’t Medicare for all.
If they’re opposed to Medicare for all at the federal but not state level they’re opposed to Medicare for all because states typically don’t have enough state level revenue to support a Medicare for all system (which either they know and are being disingenuous, or are too uninformed / stupid to realize). I know this because states don’t have enough state level revenue to support Medicaid (states get funding from the federal government for Medicaid). Or they don’t actually want Medicare for all/1
That seems like a thing that you should just get for yourself.
It’s cute you think a magat farmer is gonna get convinced of anything. A dem could walk in drenched and tell them it’s raining and they wouldn’t believe it. A repub could walk in dusty af and tell them it’s a torrential downpour and they’d buy it.
“Going up”
But you don’t get to the upper levels without establishing the foundation - and if you’re not willing to put in the work for a solid foundation then there’s 0 reason to value your opinion.
Can pull the codes from my OBD2 port - I can even google them and get a GENERAL idea of wtf is going on. But even then it’s still just a best guess - which is not even close to the best guess of someone w experience behind them. Part of learning is learning that - especially early on - your opinion doesn’t mean shit, and that being open to the expertise of others doesn’t mean you’re stupid.
Classes are able to use a common language and have at least the basic understanding of the topic. Tbh when I was teaching I didn’t gaf about what some thought about the subject in the 101 courses because they didn’t know enough about the subject to have a valid opinion on anything. And yes - this applies to any topic - eg im not an auto mechanic. My opinion on what is causing the noise in my car doesn’t (and shouldn’t) hold as much weight as someone who is a mechanic. Sure I/2
It really depends on what level of course you’re taking. A 101 class is going to be a lot of learning foundational things / history of the science. Unfortunately there’s not a lot of area open to discussion - especially not if there’s 100+ students in the class. At about 300/400 is where you start having discussions about why things are theorized to be the way they are for a couple of reasons: 1) classes are smaller, so a lot easier to have in depth discussions, and 2) most people in those/1
Bs. Harris presented a plan that would have extended the infrastructure bill AND the CHIPS act and provided plenty of well paying jobs to people in the trades - as well as plenty of other jobs. All you had to do was pay attention for more than 5 seconds.
Get fleas.
Good. Then this probably wasn’t directed at you or the people you know. But tbh I’d wonder why, if what you say is true, you read “a majority of the military support Trump” and felt the need to say “not me!!!” - if I gave a shit. Which I don’t. Cuz people that read about how shitty a group that they choose to associate with is and feels the need to say “not me!!” usually identifies with that group even tho the group is shitty. As the old saying goes - if you lie down with dogs, you’re gonna/1
Sure. But voting is still private in the military. And a clear majority of vets will publicly state that they support him. So unless your argument is that they’re doing a 180 shift upon leaving the military your arguments don’t really hold up.
Idk…Repubs have some really fucking weird fetishes. I’m sure there’s a sizable majority that got hard / aroused when that scent hit their nostrils - some close enough may have shot their load.
Ya. But usually it’s funny.
I’d say it was shocking that people believe him but tbh it’s really not. It’s actually really pathetic at this point.
I mean it worked in 2024. Gotta have something to woo the minorities back (who tend to be more socially conservative) and Gen Z males are gonna see the same shit they saw in 2024 about how women will come crawling back to them on their knees just begging to suck them off and be their good little barefoot side piece homemaker.
Markets are selling off - high fed rate means higher borrowing costs (which means less profit and less returns on stock).
The only thing dropping precipitously is the stock market. Down 1000pts in the past 2 days as of 2p mst. Doubt we’ll see a dead cat bounce tomorrow either - but I could be wrong. Investors know what high diesel costs mean - high shipping costs, high wholesale costs, and high consumer prices = high inflation (btw we’re just now getting the price increases from the last oil spike at the consumer level). Given the decent jobs numbers all the signs point to rate increases by the Fed. Which is why/1
They looked at the US southern / plains states and thought to themselves “that abject poverty and lack of functioning social services looks like a good idea”.
It’s the name they picked for themselves and it identifies the group I’m talking about.
It’s not all that won them in 24. Progressives helped a lot by staying home. But it was a big reason.
If the whole trans athlete bs didn’t win for them in 2024 they wouldn’t be reprising the tactic. The goal is to get minorities (who trend socially conservative) to ignore their current circumstances. And history suggests that it’ll work.