5362 pts ยท January 10, 2015
Kyle Canty, the only person to test that idea, had his plea rejected by Canada.
The "ramps" are built. CRT is saying the bricks and mortar etc are made of racism.
I completely agree with you but I don't have a company that sells equity and antiracism training courses.
Inequity is identified by outcomes, (eg in performance or representation). EmbraceRace only recognizes racism as the cause of disparity.
Where polices exist, compliant courses follow https://blogs.ams.org/blogonmathblogs/2020/06/21/what-does-anti-racist-mathematics-look-like/
This is why, IMO, CRT is of little value, it implies radical, untenable solutions and is sold on hyperbolic rhetoric
But I do not believe we are dealing with true revolutionaries, just people trying to find a market for expensive humanities degrees,
"Society has racism built in" + "Racism must be dismantled" begs some very obvious and commonly voiced conclusions.
This school's Anti-racism is specifically of the Kendi variety and is therefore CRT based.
No, a school having an "anti patriarchy policy" would be evidence that 3rd wave feminism will be impacting lessons.
Well most of us can't see much of the world either, because we're poor.
Does everyone in your class have equal outcomes?
The image is wrong, inequity is measured by OUTCOMES, not inputs. The pics below will still have different outcomes and thus, inequity.
https://replicationindex.com/2019/09/27/poverty-explain-racial-biases-in-police-shootings/ POOR PEOPLE, not black people.
The plan is to pay for it by privatising assets.
Just to clarify a little, ALL schools have anti racism polices but this is "Anti-Racism" specifically CRT based.
I haven't said anything against it, we're just following the trail of CRT learning and it's offspring.
https://www.k12albemarle.org/our-division/anti-racism-policy/policy
If you see "equity diversity inclusion" departments that's a CRT product.
I don't live or vote in the USA. CRT is right through my country as well.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2332649220941019
When problems are examined under a CRT lens the second part follows as the solution by the theorists.
I guarantee if you live in a western country you have CRT informing policy in education, government and business.
Equity, diversity and inclusiveness policies can be found throughout all the western world's schools, all a product of CRT.
I didn't propose banning it.
It's like the "Assault rifle" of sociology, no ready definition and depending on who you ask is either essential or must be banned outright.
https://nextgenedition.com/vancouver-school-board-phases-out-honours-programs-in-high-schools/ This is a CRT informed policy.
The conflation has been done by CRT theorists like Ibram X. Kendi, not bubba and karen. Only Kendi has zero pushback.
Yes lessons informed by CRT are being taught K-12.
Furthermore, if you are white you benefit from it and will continue to be actively racist unless you are involved in its dismantling
Kyle Canty, the only person to test that idea, had his plea rejected by Canada.
The "ramps" are built. CRT is saying the bricks and mortar etc are made of racism.
I completely agree with you but I don't have a company that sells equity and antiracism training courses.
Inequity is identified by outcomes, (eg in performance or representation). EmbraceRace only recognizes racism as the cause of disparity.
Where polices exist, compliant courses follow https://blogs.ams.org/blogonmathblogs/2020/06/21/what-does-anti-racist-mathematics-look-like/
This is why, IMO, CRT is of little value, it implies radical, untenable solutions and is sold on hyperbolic rhetoric
But I do not believe we are dealing with true revolutionaries, just people trying to find a market for expensive humanities degrees,
"Society has racism built in" + "Racism must be dismantled" begs some very obvious and commonly voiced conclusions.
This school's Anti-racism is specifically of the Kendi variety and is therefore CRT based.
No, a school having an "anti patriarchy policy" would be evidence that 3rd wave feminism will be impacting lessons.
Well most of us can't see much of the world either, because we're poor.
Does everyone in your class have equal outcomes?
The image is wrong, inequity is measured by OUTCOMES, not inputs. The pics below will still have different outcomes and thus, inequity.
https://replicationindex.com/2019/09/27/poverty-explain-racial-biases-in-police-shootings/ POOR PEOPLE, not black people.
The plan is to pay for it by privatising assets.
Just to clarify a little, ALL schools have anti racism polices but this is "Anti-Racism" specifically CRT based.
I haven't said anything against it, we're just following the trail of CRT learning and it's offspring.
https://www.k12albemarle.org/our-division/anti-racism-policy/policy
If you see "equity diversity inclusion" departments that's a CRT product.
I don't live or vote in the USA. CRT is right through my country as well.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2332649220941019
When problems are examined under a CRT lens the second part follows as the solution by the theorists.
I guarantee if you live in a western country you have CRT informing policy in education, government and business.
Equity, diversity and inclusiveness policies can be found throughout all the western world's schools, all a product of CRT.
I didn't propose banning it.
It's like the "Assault rifle" of sociology, no ready definition and depending on who you ask is either essential or must be banned outright.
https://nextgenedition.com/vancouver-school-board-phases-out-honours-programs-in-high-schools/ This is a CRT informed policy.
The conflation has been done by CRT theorists like Ibram X. Kendi, not bubba and karen. Only Kendi has zero pushback.
Yes lessons informed by CRT are being taught K-12.
Furthermore, if you are white you benefit from it and will continue to be actively racist unless you are involved in its dismantling