306 pts ยท November 2, 2012
You're answering something that wasn't asked. Read the original comment again, where "exploit" is the word used to describe something contractual and consensual.
I'm using Wikipedia too. "Many see the objectification of women taking place in the sexually oriented depictions of women in advertising, art and media, pornography, the occupations of stripping and prostitution, and women being brazenly evaluated or judged sexually or aesthetically in public spaces and events, such as beauty contests." (from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_objectification) Literally every example is something women voluntarily participate in, and none of it is unsolicited.
Probably because it's a stupid question to ask if there are non-white people, given that their population is largely European prisoners/immigrants, and they never had an involuntary influx of other nations like the Americas did with the slave trade. You're just seeing a group of white people and reflexively asking, "why aren't there black people" without actually thinking about it first.
It's Australia. Their black population is something like 5% (3% indigenous, 1.5% African). On the other hand, 17% of their population is Asian, which you DO see represented in these pictures.
I don't know that that's most people's definition. I was under the impression that porn, modelling, "breastaurants" (like Hooters), and all the rest where there's no point beyond looking at the person, were all considered "objectification" by plenty of people. This reduction of the meaning to "it's okay to stare as long as that's the point" just seems like picking a definition that justifies what you're doing, rather than recognizing the actual intent of the term.
You could have just said "date." There's no carbon involved.
Is there? Isn't the problem with objectification that you're separating the appearance from the personality and only focusing on the former?
I think it means your relationships will suffer if you can't perform.
Don't most insurances cover an annual physical 100%?
When did people start calling hair ties "ponytails"? The ponytail is what you get after you put a hair tie on, not the hair tie itself.
Do you mean just the attractive, talented ones, like the ones in the post? Or all women, no matter their fitness, ability, or personality?
Ah yes, the classic "I'm not horny, it's everyone else" comment. Guessing you also do the "RIP your inbox" one too?
Wouldn't it be easier to just screenshot the tweet?
But you don't see that "subtle push in" in this image.
Probably has something to do with the one on the right being attractive.
Is there really such a shortage of attractive redheads in the world that only a couple of images down you're already including ones like #3?
Not when they're pointing in opposite directions.
SpankBang is quite good. XVideos and xHamster are my other go-tos.
Have they counted penile nerves like this? I had thought the clitoris was more sensitive because it had the same nerves in a smaller space.
Curious on a name/source for #3.
You think she should be gifted an award over other deserving people because she happened to suffer discrimination?
Yep, for the next four years it'll be Blue Head Monday.
Some of these women (#8, #12, #13) are gorgeous. But most of them just look like they have a bad skin condition.
I feel like we didn't need the "before" picture for most of these.
I was going to say how heavy-handed that excerpt is, but upon seeing the source, it makes sense - Anne is quite the dramatic character.
v
I can't speak for anyone else, but mine does. She does at other times too, but period week is exclusively blowjobs/handjobs/boobjobs.
That movie was from 1986, so it's hardly been 90 years.
You're answering something that wasn't asked. Read the original comment again, where "exploit" is the word used to describe something contractual and consensual.
I'm using Wikipedia too. "Many see the objectification of women taking place in the sexually oriented depictions of women in advertising, art and media, pornography, the occupations of stripping and prostitution, and women being brazenly evaluated or judged sexually or aesthetically in public spaces and events, such as beauty contests." (from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_objectification) Literally every example is something women voluntarily participate in, and none of it is unsolicited.
Probably because it's a stupid question to ask if there are non-white people, given that their population is largely European prisoners/immigrants, and they never had an involuntary influx of other nations like the Americas did with the slave trade. You're just seeing a group of white people and reflexively asking, "why aren't there black people" without actually thinking about it first.
It's Australia. Their black population is something like 5% (3% indigenous, 1.5% African). On the other hand, 17% of their population is Asian, which you DO see represented in these pictures.
I don't know that that's most people's definition. I was under the impression that porn, modelling, "breastaurants" (like Hooters), and all the rest where there's no point beyond looking at the person, were all considered "objectification" by plenty of people. This reduction of the meaning to "it's okay to stare as long as that's the point" just seems like picking a definition that justifies what you're doing, rather than recognizing the actual intent of the term.
You could have just said "date." There's no carbon involved.
Is there? Isn't the problem with objectification that you're separating the appearance from the personality and only focusing on the former?
I think it means your relationships will suffer if you can't perform.
Don't most insurances cover an annual physical 100%?
When did people start calling hair ties "ponytails"? The ponytail is what you get after you put a hair tie on, not the hair tie itself.
Do you mean just the attractive, talented ones, like the ones in the post? Or all women, no matter their fitness, ability, or personality?
Ah yes, the classic "I'm not horny, it's everyone else" comment. Guessing you also do the "RIP your inbox" one too?
Wouldn't it be easier to just screenshot the tweet?
But you don't see that "subtle push in" in this image.
Probably has something to do with the one on the right being attractive.
Is there really such a shortage of attractive redheads in the world that only a couple of images down you're already including ones like #3?
Not when they're pointing in opposite directions.
SpankBang is quite good. XVideos and xHamster are my other go-tos.
Have they counted penile nerves like this? I had thought the clitoris was more sensitive because it had the same nerves in a smaller space.
Curious on a name/source for #3.
You think she should be gifted an award over other deserving people because she happened to suffer discrimination?
Yep, for the next four years it'll be Blue Head Monday.
Some of these women (#8, #12, #13) are gorgeous. But most of them just look like they have a bad skin condition.
I feel like we didn't need the "before" picture for most of these.
I was going to say how heavy-handed that excerpt is, but upon seeing the source, it makes sense - Anne is quite the dramatic character.
I can't speak for anyone else, but mine does. She does at other times too, but period week is exclusively blowjobs/handjobs/boobjobs.
That movie was from 1986, so it's hardly been 90 years.