So, this coffee shop just opened in Los Angeles

Feb 9, 2014 10:33 PM

he2lium

Views

224561

Likes

8803

Dislikes

150

Y'all so dumb, you really really dumb. For real.

12 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

I don't get why do you have to include starbucks in your buisness why not just make a legit coffee shop?

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ie: we are too cheap/lazy to market ourselves.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So if they function as a coffee shop, and aren't calling Starbucks dumb, why not just come up with their own name?

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I almost feel like the regular Starbucks is doing this to prove a point or maybe try to overturn a law.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you're gonna go through the trouble, you could at least call it Starsucks.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They should have called it "Muthafuckin' Starbucks".

12 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 3

aww yis

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

That's . . . that's not how fair use works

12 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

I don't think this works under the fair use policy, but it is a great idea.

12 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Is this a Starbucks? No this is Patrick

12 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

WOW! I didn't know there were SO MANY LAWYERS on Imgur! I'll just post here next time I get a ticket or murder someone.

12 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

As a law student, I recommend not announcing that you killed someone. Disclaimer: this is not legal advice and should not be relied upon. :P

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Now let's see "Dumb McDonald's" and "Dumb Subway"

12 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

you leave Subway alone! I am broke and on a diet!

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like the sound of "Dumb Jack in a Box"

12 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Dumb In 'n Out

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dumb Hardee's

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And that's how South Park gets away with directly insulting so many celebrities and companies.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think this is a dumb idea.

12 years ago | Likes 118 Dislikes 7

There's a meme for that.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's a meme for everything

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To be fair, Weird Al asks permission before parodying a song.

12 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

He does now, but he hasn't always. Coolio got pretty upset because of Al's 'Amish Paradise'. I believe 'Eat it' was before that time.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Coolio should have been honored not only was it free publicity but it meant he was relevant at the time. Notice no one is parodying him now.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Amish Paradise was a breach in communication, One of Coolio's reps give consent without asking.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So Coolio claims anyway, regardless, when the royalties started rolling in he shut up about it.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ten bucks says this shop is owned by Starbucks and it's all a marketing ploy.

12 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Ten bucks you say? Well if you're right you'll have enough to get yourself a tall... hooker.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The FAQs author clearly knows nothing about the law in regard to parody (ie fair use). Have fun being sued into the stone age, if not a hoax

12 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 2

It is okay. That is for their lawyers to worry about.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Can you elaborate?

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

IIRC fair use is vague and generally not even this broad for things like video clips...esp. since they admit they're bull shitting.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so you can use someone's intellectual property as long as you do it in an insulting manner..?

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

No. Whoever opened the store knows nothing about the law.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. This is a bastardization of the fair use law...said law's purpose was so that private media would be able to critic and review IP...

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...under protection from instant lawsuit. You know how Apple will sue for any remote reference to their products or brand? That is what...

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...Fair Use avoids. Plus "written permission" is unrealistic for everyone to try obtain. Small media, college students,youtubers. This is...

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

...the kind of loophole abuse Lobbyists of large corporations can use to severely cripple allowances like Fair Use.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Really? "Dumb Starbucks?" Why not something like "Starsucks?" They should get sued for their lack of creativity.

12 years ago | Likes 100 Dislikes 6

You should get sued for a lack of creativity. You commented the exact same thing on the other Dumb Starbucks photo on the popular page.

12 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Indeed I did, though to be fair, I commented on this one first, then duplicated my comment on the other. I didn't know which would last.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, the creativity of the comment is still mine, even if I posted it twice for the sake of practicality. :P

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Parody law doesn't cover trademarks I didn't think.

12 years ago | Likes 300 Dislikes 1

Even if true [it's not], Fair Use is a defense you can use in your costly trial, not a magic "avoid lawsuit" card you can play.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It does, but the parody here is for commercial use & there's strong likelihood of confusion btw real & fake trademarks so, this won't fly.

12 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Just ask the manufacturers of "South Butt" apparel. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_South_Butt

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nope, it doesn't.

12 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 1

Yeah. Starbucks legal team is passing around the gloves and Crisco as we speak, with a big, ugly, leering grin. DIS GUN BE GUD

12 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

yep, the logo too :/ needs to be changed.

12 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Even if it did, it would take a particularly...well...dumb judge to interpret this as parody or art.

12 years ago | Likes 113 Dislikes 1

You mean like a judge that would allow trademarking of "candy"?

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Or just a judge who doesn't like big corporations

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I don't think it covers businesses. At least in Australia, it only covers expressive work, such as literary, dramatic, musical or artistic.

12 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Never trust the overreach of Intellectual Property laws in the US.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

(Copyright Act, 1968, sect 41A). Plus, judges interpret the law as a 'reasonable man'. I don't think any reasonable person thinks this (2/3)

12 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

anything other that a smart-assed way to try get around the law and play off another business' popularity to make money (3/3)

12 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Sauce: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/dumb-starbucks-shop-appears-las-678728

12 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

damn...those photos are insane. Just shows how plugged in people and how fast news travels

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I hope they do get sued. Piggybacking is selfish and rude.

12 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Would have been more funny if they used other adjectives than just "dumb".

12 years ago | Likes 432 Dislikes 7

"Star-Schmucks" http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Xi9BRgjvOlk

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Silly Starbucks! Alliteration people!

12 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

'I can't believe its not Starbucks'

12 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

"Fuck Starbucks"

12 years ago | Likes 108 Dislikes 1

Hahah made me chuckle +1

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I giggled out loud

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Better Starbucks"

12 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I don't think Shitty Starbucks would sell

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That would defeat the purpose. "Dumb" is the thing that hold everything together and makes it a parody.

12 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

They could use other mocking adjectives though. "Contradictory tall", "Ridiculous frappuccino", "I'm too lazy to come up with a 3rd example"

12 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

Dan Starbucks

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Stupid-ass Frappaccino, Retarded Ice, Dumb White Bitch Chocolate Mocha, Dipshit Delight...

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like 'Caffine free...'

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Someone should now start a coffee shop called Dumb Dumb Starbucks. Then they're not using Starbucks IP just dumb Starbucks IP.

12 years ago | Likes 1242 Dislikes 3

Shit, I better get on that before ya'll do. I was thinking that halfway through.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We must go deeper??? No, no we mustn't.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stupid sexy Starbucks.

12 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

The fact that they say it's for marketing and the "dumb" is just an excuse pretty much ensures that this won't work

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

under TM law, you'd still be liable to suit for infringement.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

This is Dumbception.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd love to see a shopping center full of ever increasingly dumb starbucks spanning as far as the eye can see.

12 years ago | Likes 187 Dislikes 0

Dumb and Dumber.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

how would it be different from any shopping centre right now?

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That sounds like a dumb idea...

12 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 2

I agree I find this all to be dumb dumb.

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

dumb and dumber starbucks;)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All I could think of is "ME NO DUM DUM! ME KING!"

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel like this really needs to happen.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that's smart thinking, that'l get you somewhere.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It would have to sell lollipops too

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dumb dumb-dumbs

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Great idea, but it is quite a scumbag move to use their trademark to earn money

12 years ago | Likes 108 Dislikes 19

Well, you know...art.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Isn't it though? I love it.

12 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

They don't charge for anything, though.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The drinks are all free. The signs are just part of the parody. Scones can't be taken, cash register doesn't open; only the drinks are real.

12 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

They do have real pastries, also free.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah right, the drinks may be free. But with the publicity they get, they earn money in a second step.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

so how do they make money?

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Perhaps by making another event, that actually costs money."Oh hey look, the ones that made dumbstarbucks, let's have a look" Just marketing

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

True, I wasn't sure if you knew something i didn't. Thanks.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

See, they're McDonald's. We're MacDowell's. They have the Golden Arches, we have the Golden Arcs! They got the Big Mac, we got the Big Mick.

12 years ago | Likes 581 Dislikes 1

Dat's beautiful. What is dat, velvet?

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I call it a Royal with cheese.

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Fascinating! Semmi, look at this! America is great indeed. Imagine a country so free, one can throw glass on the streets!

12 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 0

upvote for Eddie Murphy

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'd eat a Big Mick.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I love you jaylerd

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

put in a plug for the new salad bar!

12 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

My favorite move ever. Thank you!!!

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Kidding, but hey, I figured you'd appreciate it :P

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Why is this not the top comment?

12 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

My guess is the average age of imgur's user base means most aren't familiar with this wonderful movie.

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I actually just watched this movie for the first time two weeks ago and was very pleased to understand there references :)

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The best were the two bums - Randolf and Mortimer.. line "we're back in business". I pissed myself laughing at that.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They have two beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, and onions on a sesame seed bun. Our buns don't have seeds, understand?

12 years ago | Likes 116 Dislikes 0

Yes.

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I want a woman that will arouse my intellect as well as my loins

12 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

The royal penis is clean, your Highness.

12 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

This place is going to thrive.

12 years ago | Likes 241 Dislikes 11

Until Starbucks sues their dicks off.

12 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 0

And then sues them for that dick

12 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

12 years ago (deleted Feb 10, 2014 5:06 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

And they're very, very wrong about that. Starbucks is going to own them. Or at least, own everything they used to own.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Good luck convincing a judge that selling coffee under the Starbucks name, menu, and logo is "parody," particularly when they admit it's 1/2

12 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

I was wondering about that part.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

not actually a parody and just want to use the name and logo. 2/2

12 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Awww, you're adorable

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Thanks :)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1