UC Davis

Apr 21, 2015 2:20 AM

dipity90

Views

507744

Likes

13178

Dislikes

1333

The picture everyone knows

November 18th, 2011, students at UC Davis who were protesting as part of Occupy Wall Street were pepper sprayed by police.

Yesterday, I was downvoted for saying that this picture often gets taken out of context.

As this post has received more attention than I'd planned, I want to say that my point is not to say that the police are right. I only want people to see that there is more. It's frustrating that people take a single image on imgur as news, and don't do their own work to find out more.

I plan to edit captions, as I've been told my recounting of the recorded events were biased, to try and give more sides.

Before that

In a video that captured events from before students were pepper sprayed, you see police at the scene in full riot gear. The university police called in for assistance from additional departments (some officers who assaulted students at Berkley are present) inform the crowd that they will be subject to arrest if they do not leave the area. This might seem strange... it's withing our constitutional right to protest.

However, the day before, students had set up tents. The University instructed for them to be removed by a certain time. When many of the students did not comply, police were sent to remove the tents. Only after the students refused removal and prevented the police from removing the tents were they asked to leave.

More warnings

An officer continues to instruct people to leave. He cites the law in which the students are in violation, gives detail on how they will be arrested, and what consequences will follow. The students continue to chant and do not move. Only then do the police move forward.

On November 23 Katehi (UC Davis Chancellor) stated that she only told the campus police "to remove the tents or the equipment." She stresses that she told them "very specifically to do it peacefully, and if there were too many of them, not to do it, if the students were aggressive, not to do it. And then we told them we also do not want to have another Berkeley"

A handful of students are arrested

Students begin to chant, "set them free." They then "march peacefully" toward where the arrested students are being held on the ground.

Students link arms and surround the police

The students chant "if you let them go, we will let you leave."

Each student blocking the path is told the consquences

This officer goes to each individual student blocking the path and informs them that if they do not move, they will be subject to force. He then asks if they understand this. No one moves.

Another warning

They are trying to get a police car down the path, but students will not move.

With those under arrest also within the circle, they must clear a path in order to get them to the car

They ask again for students to move.

Students are warned they will be "shot with pepper spray"

This student then yells, "you're going to shoot me?!" which raises new chants among the students. "Don't shoot students."

Then this happens

The students had been given enough warning that most of them found things with which to cover their faces. Students not on the path even hand over scarves and bandannas to those who are.

"Our line that they pepper-sprayed was ... one-person-deep. One of the officers began to remove us physically without the use of weapons. And Lieutenant John Pike ordered them to stop, raising his pepper can and saying ... 'Leave them. I want to spray these kids.'" - William, eyewitness protester You cannot hear this in the video, and I don't know if it was said, but a protester claimed that it was.

You can see the full video of the incident here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjXcaoEAkq4

Edit: I wasn't expecting this to get as much attention as it is. Obviously, I have my opinion of the matter, but my point in posting this was not to attempt to sway others to my opinion, or even try to say that the police were correct. I am not condoning police brutality. My thought was only that opinions be formed from more than this single photograph. If you still think, or changed your mind to think, that the police were in the wrong, I'm okay with that. If you think the police were in the right, I'm okay with that. If you're somewhere in between (as I actually am, many of you seem to think otherwise), I'm okay with that too.

I do appreciate the conversations this has gotten going, though.

I've come across some more videos, but don't have time to fully watch them right now. I will say, that one does show police arresting students somewhat forcefully.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3A0d9fHWag
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjXk9wYWIE8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwFa5Kq4Rfo

I have been pepper sprayed. I would have immediately complied.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I call bullshit. We know what happened and STILL think it was the wrong thing to do.

11 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 13

Unless you were there you don't know what happened. The media will report whatever makes the best story.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We? Are you the head of the group opinion committee?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Haha. "Well, they were warned they'd be maced at point blank rage. Brutality justified!"

11 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 25

thank you

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Exactly, NO GUYS it's okay, they were warned many times, they could have just stopped protesting! (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 10

This should NEVER be the response to protesting,you can't just say stop or I'll mace you to stop a protest. This post didn't change shit.

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 15

I attended UC Davis at the time. Everything said in this post is true. Students were breaking the law and being so so so stupid...

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

........go Aggies.

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

And then we go on about how we have to explain that an Aggie is our mascot. Which is a horse. It should really be a cow.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I think "gunrock" is our mascot and we are aggies...... who knows.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For decades cops picked them up and moved them without spraying them in the face with mace. Cop later lied and said he felt threatened.

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

Can't touch anyone without getting a sexual assault charge or excessive force investigation

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

That's bullshit and you know it. Don't defend this fat fuck.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Could happen though.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If OP isn't lying they were following protocol. If people want to fix the issue they should lobby their state for riot protocol reformation.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As I said - they pick people up and move them. This fat fuck sprayed them in the face and later lied about it, saying they threatened him.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Regardless, if within protocol, he seems to have given plenty warning of what was to come. Seemed handled well.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, physically moving people in a crowded area while surrounded may lead to violence and rather outlandish claims.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Soo.... slowpoke?

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

A pebble in a lake comment here, but if no one showed up to oppose this, they would be a bunch of ignored students sitting on campus.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I live there, and saw it happen. I left before these picture were taken, but it was a very upsetting situation for everyone.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

i was on vacation when this happened and saw it on the news in Hawaii and was just like "what the fuck happened"

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There was still no excuse for what was done.

11 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 51

They were all told that they were going to be subject to force, and they had the chance to move. Their protest had no basis anyway.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

I thought that too until I just read all this.. there are two sides to a story and the emotional one we cling onto isn't always the right 1

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 9

Hey OP, I was in the circle of folks sprayed. You're neglecting the fact that they were A) Non-violent, B) there was a huge hole in the

11 years ago | Likes 161 Dislikes 75

Right to Protest does not cover third party entities, just the government. Universities are not the government.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

I have a hard time buying into that claim given that it's a public/state university and not a private institution like Stanford.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Jun 10, 2015 12:28 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I don't really know how to respond. I have personal issues that make it hard for me to be involved in this stuff, but I think the protest

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

was worth my time.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

time space continuum which allowed the enemy access to our solar system. And that's how the invasion began.

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

I like the added humor, this sort of stuff needs it sometimes. That and it wasn't aimed to hurt folks. (Unless...)

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

In hindsight I have been rather emotionally charged. I am obviously biased. The students broke the law, but the level of force was poorly

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

chosen in my mind. A quick decision was made that escalated the situation. I don't regret protesting or supporting folks breaking the law,

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

just that the actions of the folks involved led to people getting hurt. I'm glad it didn't turn more violent.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

May I ask why the tents were there in the first place? (Not meant in an accusing tone I am genuinely curious)

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

It was a tactic used in the past that was borrowed from the Occupy Movement. Having tents and a continual presence on the quad allowed for

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

students to collaborate and plan protests, while also creating a visual demonstration of their protest. The chancellor's decision to remove

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

students by any means necessary was when things went sour. That and a bit of a break down in command. That is IIRC.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Depends on which use of continuum they were using. Passive aggression is counted as force and if necessary you can use.... 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

Personal protection equipment. Or ppe. Sauce: I'm a corrections officer.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

I can see how what the students did would be breaking the law. The people arrested went limp while other students circled folks that were

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

in the process of being apprehended and essentially hoped to stop the arresting officers from carrying out the arrests. I am obviously

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

a biased individual here, because many friends of mine were there, and I went to support them. I think the force was poorly executed/chosen.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Oh, and you also forgot that Pike bent down to spray directly into the faces of the students after brandishing the pepper spray and stepping

11 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 33

Where would you expect him to spray it? In their hair? On their shoes?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

You're supposed to use pepper spray indirectly, filling the area around the person's face, not directly into their mouth/eyes/nose

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Gotta aim for eyes otherwise your just wasting it

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

over the students without any obstruction from the students sitting on the ground. You also neglect to mention the giant crowd that

11 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 17

By obstruction I mean they did not stop Pike from stepping over them.

11 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 12

got up and followed the officers off of the quad but CONTINUED to stay non-violent. Nothing was thrown. There wasn't a riot.

11 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 14

Sounds legit. Intimidating a police officer (campus police? either way), nothing wrong with that.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

Sorry, to clarify people followed a bit, stopped, and chanted that they could leave. And the crowd stopped and helped folks when

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

circle near the back that isn't picture OR in the video.

11 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 29

thanks for what you did. Judging by the comments, OP is in the minority implying it was acceptable

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 12

I do not think the cop should have sprayed them that closely.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hah. Wouldn't you like to think so!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Non-violent does not mean legal. If you were obstructing police officers making arrests, that's on you even if you're being non-violent.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

True, but I would argue that civil disobedience has always been a part of non-violent protest. The aim isn't to obey the law, it's to

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

There is definitely an argument to be had there. But that's just how it is, there's two sides to every story.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

challenge the status quo. Would it be reasonable for officers to use rubber bullets/bean bags on a crowd of chanting students? It depends,

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

on the situation. In this case, the officers seemed to show restraint, and none of them were hurt in the end. Just students who were

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What does it matter how many warnings they were told. Is it ever okay to treat non violent humans like this??

11 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 7

Yes. Non-Violent does not mean non-dangerous nor non-threatening. on-violent has escalated to violent manytimes. They had the right to do it

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

They had tents? Whoa, that changes everything! REI terrorists don't deserve their Constitutional or human rights.

11 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 45

I'm surprised that such a trollish comment is getting so many upvotes...

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 15

Mocking? Sure. Humorous? Arguably. Espousing civil rights? Definitely. Trollish? Doesn't seem that way to me, and certainly not the intent.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can't protest and break laws while doing it.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Actually you can. However you are subject to arrest.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, you can. It's occasionally the entire point of the protest. I will agree that if you break the laws while protesting you should be 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

prepared to handle the consequences.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

i refuse to either up or downvote this post or any of it's comments. this shit is gnarly

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

You mean...there's more than one side of stories?! Lies!

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Where went the classic "drag the passive resistors away as they continue to passively resist" thing? Time consuming, yes, but less extreme.

11 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 7

It kills me that ppl act as if nothing should be done to get protestors like these to move. They stopped protesting their "cause" (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

when they moved to prevent the police from removing their cohorts. That's obstruction and does nothing to add value to their original point.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

bottom line: never go outside. not because of cops, riots, or mace. but because of the sun. it's excessively bright.

11 years ago | Likes 385 Dislikes 15

The sun needs to chill out and cool it with all the light and heat.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

who is it trying to impress?! we get it! nuclear fission or whatever is great! it's enough already!!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Never forget your sunbrella. Or your towel. Who do i look like? Douglas Adams?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

is that really the takeaway here?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

this is Imgur.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As someone who was sunburned yesterday, he has a good point.

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Jul 12, 2016 7:43 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Its that slightly brighter area the clouds that you see during the day

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

All i see is tea.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a Californian, I will trade you a week of sun for a week of rain. Deal?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

thuroughly unpleasant affair. beat not to be botheres with it.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

really fail to see how people don't understand this. Like it or not, circling cops making arrests, wether during a peaceful protest (1/?)

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 13

or not, is considered threatening because it is a threat to their safety. IF the protest were to turn violent, they would be surrounded(2/?)

11 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 9

and cutoff from backup. Their lives would be in danger, and like it or not, that is something that matters. So don't try and sell me (3/?)

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 8

the line about how this was a peaceful protest. They have to take this seriously at all times so that when it's not, they don't die. (4/4)

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 8

so when i go shopping in a crowded area im allowed to use force because im surrounded and cut off from an exit if they were to turn violent?

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 13

That would depend. Did the people surrounding you do so to intentionally prevent you from leaving, and did you give them fair warning?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

did they actually do anything to stop him? as i recall not one hand was placed on the man, sounds like they were literally just in the way

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

"the evidence does not provide an objective, factual basis for Lt. Pike's purported belief that he was trapped" (1)

11 years ago | Likes 599 Dislikes 176

Lol who exactly do YOU think said that? I'll give ya a hint: the protestors

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

It might be better to cite a non-biased article, all the authors are from Davis

11 years ago | Likes 118 Dislikes 17

at one point they chant "set them free and we will let you go," I'd say that alone would be enough for me to draw a weapon.

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 11

"They said words!?" *blam blam blam* - OP if cop probably

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I hope you are not trying to become a cop.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Notice where the quotes are. That's what the article said not the officer.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Not an article, one of two reports commissioned by the university.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"that any of his officers were trapped, or that the safety of their arrestees was at issue." (2)

11 years ago | Likes 332 Dislikes 108

After reading that report it sounds like that is an every body gets fucked report.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Thank you for giving context to OPs bullshit.

11 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 51

My bullshit was simply information taken from a video. I tried to keep it factual.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Consider citing nonbiased parties in the future. The report is up front about being authored by UC Davis students and faculty.

11 years ago | Likes 109 Dislikes 25

YOU DA REAL MVP

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

The report authored by Kroll, a private firm, is in that same link.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That it was authored by students and faculty does not denote bias.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 21

The fact that the targets were UC Davis students makes the chance non-negligible.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

(I'd also personally be skeptical of the faculty involved given the academic push behind OWS at the time.)

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

It doesn't matter if safety was an issue or if they were trapped. The only time you use a tool for safety reasons is when you're using

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Lethal force to protect yourself. What you see here is an attempt to gain compliance through pain, which is lawful.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

That's crowd-control pepper spray, you are supposed to spray it at 30 feet, not point blank.

11 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 7

And in my country they just passed a law which states that it is illegal to film cops if it compromises national security (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"A matter of national security". The eternal cry of the oppressor.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Which by definition is too subjective and will cut both ways, whether the cops or the people are doing wrong or right. (2/2)

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh good I'm glad we got the real story from a certified Internet Detective

11 years ago | Likes 642 Dislikes 190

Watch the video...

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

Hes probably a cop. Trying to make his fellow sociopaths look good.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 15

Wow, youre pretty mental, arent ya?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Fuck off.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I find it strange that when a chef or a plumber goes and murders people nobody calls the rest of the members of the workforce sociopaths.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do some research on police abuse. Talk with cops inrl see how they treat you. Hell of a lot more sociopaths in that line of work than plumb.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Oh wait no I don't. That would be fucking stupid just like calling all cops sociopaths.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I go to Davis, and I saw a lot of this happen. He hit it right on the head.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Upvote for a fellow Aggie anyway :)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was a 4th year at Davis at the time. IMO the use of force was unnecessary and avoidable despite the protestors being foolish.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I laughed.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

i like how this is just sarcastic enough to garner upvotes from all sides

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They gave their opinion and then linked to the video so you could watch it and generate your own opinion. Quit being a cock

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

All he did was watch the video; which is more than most people can say. None of this is new information, just overlooked information.

11 years ago | Likes 154 Dislikes 9

And that is what a detective's job is, to look at overlooked information.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's not overlooked, it's irrelevant. Prodigious use of pepper spray at close range against seated people, in academia of all places, 1)

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 81

This is why your views are ignored, you cannot find enough sense about you to use logic, therefore no one can readily believe what you say.

11 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

is really the ultimate video of a police state quashing free speech. This is the shit Russia uses to pretend it's better 2)

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 51

Have you seen the video? He says "If you don't move we will pepper spray you" and the student replies "Ok". 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

2/2 Before they get sprayed the students all gather hoodies and hats to cover their faces. They were made fully aware and consented.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

me too, as opposed to an out of context photo blown up to appeal to our emotions instead of making us question it.

11 years ago | Likes 107 Dislikes 30

People are stupid, a person is smart - man disappointed his son wants to ride unicycles professionally

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Goats are like mushrooms, if you shoot a duck, Im scared of toasters.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Have you met... us?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Apr 22, 2015 1:24 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I know the moral high ground is like a drug but it's time for you to come down. Use your critical thinking instead.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Apr 22, 2015 1:24 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

What spin? There weren't enough cops to move them and deal with the crowd. They were warned and sprayed, simple. Actions have consequences.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

They aren't handcuffed. You can clearly see people using their hands to cover their faces. Are you being willfully ignorant?

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

"If you let them go, we will let you leave." they chanted.. idk if peaceful protesters trap police while they are making an arrest either

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

given this other side of the argument, turn out it was incredibly logical. To be honest I hadn't thought it was possible either until now

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Found the protester.

11 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 10

I was actually attending UC Davis at the time, but had no interest in protesting.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Ha, I see what you did there. Well played, @Grindfather901. Well Played.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

As a student who currentlygoes here, issue was less of 'Wall Stree protest'. It was more of rising tuition and fund mismanagement.

11 years ago | Likes 1034 Dislikes 9

Also the cops show up in riot gear.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I got sprayed that day, then dropped out and went to community college.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Nice to hear what colleges are really about. Raise tuition and fees, shut up and deal with it. Ugh.

11 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 9

Yeah buddy

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

And a little pepper in the face to show you what the "real world" is all about.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Go Aggies: I was on Campus when this happened

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you, I cannot believe how many people aren't even aware of what this was actually about

11 years ago | Likes 171 Dislikes 3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UC_Davis_pepper-spray_incident first line says that is was part of the "occupy movement"

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 13

Funny how people judge Putin in Russia and don't judge Obama regarding this issue.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually, the two issues are quite closely linked, especially by Elizabeth Warren. (i.e. bank's loans from the Fed vs. student loans).

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then don't go to the college if it's too expensive

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 15

Why dont poor people just stop being poor? Its sooo simple!

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

thats a great idea man. *eyeroll*

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Have a friend holding a poster saying "students, not customers" but they're paying for something, so they are in fact, both. got no response

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Let's make that not true - here's to FREE education!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

pssh what is this? Canada? If only

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hi fellow Aggie!

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And you survived Picnic Day and 4/20 *I tip my cap you*

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Mostly by staying home and doing homework!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted May 16, 2016 9:01 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

you guys realize you CAN go to higher ed in other countries right? you could starve the US of their money

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Apr 9, 2016 10:45 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

not really. depends on where you are. try bologna or Bonn. Its nice and cheap there. about $300 euros a month rent.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and not for nothing, but do the math, and even if you live in a more expensive city, you still come out with less debt than if you stayed

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you try doing that in my home state of New Jersey, it'll easily cost double if not triple in rent

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sorry I meant about $300 to $400 in Euros a month for rent.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Many of the best universities are in the US. There's also the issue that not everyone can/wants to leave their family for four years.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the best universities are NOT in the US. teaching here sucks, and I say that having been through both European and American systems. 1)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

4) for researchers, but for an undergrad degree that should be the least of your concerns as you are there to study not do research

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

5) and even if you were, picking ranked insitutions is a shit way to pick grad schools. if you want to do nuclear reactor physics, you'd be

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

2) the only reason the US insiitutions get high ranks is professor and grad student research output, which is often done merely so you can

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

6) an idiot to go to Harvard as they don't even DO that type of research.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

3) say you publish, and not because you have meaningful results, and I say that as a physicist. Albeit some institutions attract more talent

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

It is nice to see behind the scenes of events like this.

11 years ago | Likes 2900 Dislikes 124

Yeah, if only the mainstream media took the time to investigate like this instead of just turning people against cops

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love DVD extras.

11 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

It is within our constitutional right to protest, BUT, once it has been ruled an unlawful assembly by police, then you must disperse.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

If we always did that then women wouldn't vote. They could limit your right to protest to make it irrelevant and then you wouldn't have shit

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Pepper spray was the best option. The students had to be removed but if the officers had played a hand on them the students may have>

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

< fought back. As soon as a student hit an officer they are "assaulting an officer" which is a much more serious crime. Good guy ->

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

<- pepper spray cop was preventing them from getting a serious crime on their records. He looks like a dick, but the kids get off clean.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I still think the pepper spray guy is a dickwad though.

11 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 10

He was suspended and later fired

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There's a word that a lot of people love to disregard and it's called "CONTEXT"

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It's nice to see a bunch of entitled douche bags get pepper sprayed LOL. http://imgur.com/iO9hWjk

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

Boohoo. My friends got shot by police. Fuck your pepper spray.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Ageed. Look Gregory, Chamel and her friends stood uo to the nasty police today.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And PS if your white and are so privileged to name your daughter Camille ..I hate your guts

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you're white and Camille is 36 I hate your guts

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Totally agree with OP, I was there at UCD when it happened and was surprised at the media circus that followed

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

It is

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like... 3 AND A HALF YEARS LATE!

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

but all of those people already spent their outrage

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The detailed versions were very available the day after the incident. I like the one that has all four videos imposed next to each other.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Behind the gif anyone?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There's always two sides. Sometimes it's not worth to see both of them, but most of the time it is.

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

the claim that the police were locked inside a circle is false. Watch Mr Pike walk very freely: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q09i3PKIf50

11 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 10

Because their vehicle was detained not a person. Braided brainwashed

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

But could they move their vehicle with detainees?

11 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 6

The humanity! Not detained college students. Society was on the verge of collapse.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 38

i appreciate your sarcasm. i raised you from the dead, 0 to 1. Seven's blessings, on you

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 15

Well I take back what I said a few years ago....

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

Whenever I see clips or pictures from things like this, I always try to dig up more info and longer videos.

11 years ago | Likes 461 Dislikes 36

A lot of my friends hate me b/c i do this. They trot out words like 'rape culture'. Im not saying justified, just saying makes more sense.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

But they say i'm defending cops etc. And i'm like no if you watch the vids, and here, unbiased arts w/several witness sta-"RED HERRING"

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Suggested free seminars at town centers where a speaker covers etiquette around police & educates on civil rights. They hated the idea.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Still not an excuse to spray them...

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

THANK you, OP. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills whenever something like this happens. I always say there's GOT to be more to the story.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

We need more people like you... :)

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

There seems to be a lot of comments asking "why couldn't they just step over the students?". I'm thinking perhaps it's a mix of the (1/?)

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

following: students have repeatedly not complied to verbal orders, so following that, there is no way the police would have known that (2/?)

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

it would be 100% safe to just "step" over the students; it's quite difficult to actually step over a body, let alone be holding onto (3/?)

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

another person to do it; the motive for students was to get the police to let the arrested go, which is well, just not possible (4/?)

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Now do that 'don't taze me bro' guy!

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I watched the whole thing happen in person. Dipity90 is very correct in what happened, the issue is you can't use military grade mace (1/?)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

on protestors. The FBI even said that you must be 9 feet away to use it or you will severely injure the said person. It's also illegal (1/?)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

to have and use in California, and a huge investigation happened where they were trying to figure out where the Davis police got it (1/?)

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Also, in the same video, the cops just kind of walk past the students to pepper spray them. They claimed they were cut off, and yet (1/?)

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It really seems like you are trying to justify this.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's not the events that lead up to the event that was the problem. It was his cited reason for doing it. He stated he felt he was in danger

11 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 6

So you think the actions were justified? Really? So peaceful protests need violence to break up?

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 13

Obstructing police officers from putting arrested people into police cars in a safe and expedient manner, yes. They had time to move.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

So you justify cops showing up in full SWAT gear to a peaceful protest? That's just sad.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Full RIOT gear yes, 10 men surrounded by 300 I'd hope they'd have shields and pepper spray so they have options that doesn't kill someone.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This wasn't violent

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

Let's pepper spray you and see how you feel after.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yes. If I am breaking the rules of the campus I have privilege, not right, to be on. If I repeatedly disregard the officers telling me (1/)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It wasn't peaceful if these students deliberately are going out of their way to ignore warnings and make things difficult

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Were they destroying property? Causing riots? Being violent?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Still not justified. I believe people have the right to peaceful protest. Also fuck the bankers!

11 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 50

3/X students blocked the path of the police car. Actual police brutality would be the officers simply pushing the students with the car.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

4/X The students had absolutely no basis for their protest. The students that were arrested were in the wrong, it's that simple.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Actually, in the full context, the police showed up to take down tents that were not allowed to be set up, then the protest escalated. 1/?

11 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

Yes dude, that's the point. The tents were the "Technicality" needed to arrest them. How fucking square do you have to be to not realize?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

The arrests were a result of people resisting the tents being taken down.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because when people were resisting the tents being taken down, the police started arresting. 2/2

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

It wasn't a peaceful protest. The officers were on campus to remove tents after the students were asked by the school to do so 1/X

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

2/X The students refused to remove their illegally placed tents and were arrested, and the cops had to intervene once a group formed and -

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

5/X They were defending students that were not innocent. Regardless of how petty the crime, it was still a crime that they committed.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You have the right to protest, but you can't break laws and violate other people's rights while doing so. Which these chumps were doing.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Then you arrest those people, and not dousing them in harmful chemicals.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, those "chemicals" have been ruled legal to use to make an arrest as a compliance tool.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Oh, if they have been ruled OK everything is totally fine.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're 100% right. In order to get compliance, police should just give hugs and unicorns out. That'll work

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's hard to arrest 20+ people linked in arms. If someone has fight in them, it will take multiple people to do so.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes it is hard, taking 2-3 cops. Your point being?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Circled, threatened, and trapped? What's stopping them just stepping over the students sitting in a circle..

11 years ago | Likes 193 Dislikes 59

https://youtu.be/K8Uj1cV97XQ?t=6m20s 6 min, 30 seconds in

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's what Pike did. Multiple times.

11 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

Not wanting to run people over with police vehicles.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Apparently they needed to move vehicles in and out of that path, which is arguably harder to have step over people. I still have no opinion.

11 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 3

They could have run the students over, that's the vehicle analogy to stepping over, right?

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

getting punched in the nuts? falling and breaking an arm? plenty of stuff

11 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 23

You're not going to fall unless they interfere, if they interfere or nut punch that's when the police take action.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

people fall over a bump in the sidewalk in america then sue the govt for it. If the cop fell over and landed on some kid can you imagine?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Are you saying the consequences for a cop falling over would've been worse than the consequences for pepper spraying them in the face?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

exactly, unless they actually interfere with the officer they hadnt done anything other than talk, the second one lays a hand on him 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

he can use as much force as he feels necessary, but until then they are just a crowd

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Holy fucking shit, the ridiculous verbal gymnastics the cop apologists in this place are willing to go through never fail to impress.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 20

Cop apologists? Don't break the law, or obstruct justice, and no one will pepper spray your face. Seems like a good trade.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

Yeah, I've always had this opinion. Cops are assholes, there's not much to do about that. Just shut up now and talk later in court.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I just don't understand this need to demonize police. Cops, in general, are brave, caring, upright motherfuckers. I'm glad they're out there

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I have limited respect for someone who shows up in full swat gear for fear of being slapped in the johnson.

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 15

And what if you get knocked down by the group and a student takes your gun?

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I don't think "what if" scenarios really have a place here. What if all the students secretly had ak47's?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's all about maintaining security and making absolutely sure everyone is safe. When a gun is involved, you take all kinds of precautions

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The students never interfered with police stepping over them. You never see that in the video. And I never saw it from my vantage point.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

But would they have interfered if the police tried to bring the detained people out?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Quick question, if these students were non violent, why couldn't they just arrest or forcibly move them? Why pepper spray?

11 years ago | Likes 212 Dislikes 11

Lazy bastards solution.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 28

How do you forcibly remove someone without casuing bodily harm? Pepper Spray.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There was a spider, he was trying to help

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because if one of the students refused to move then and started a fight the cops could get even more shit for doing their jobs.

11 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 5

The students surrounded the police and linked arms

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

several officers were able to leave the encircled crowd without the use of force including who led two prisoners through the encircled crowd

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've heard that as far as the law is concerned, this counts as holding the officers hostage. Don't quote me on that though.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Ran out of characters. That was a quote from the Kroll report on this incident.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah pepper spray is at the bottom of the force ladder. Physically restraining and moving someone is more dangerous and can cause more dmg.

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

That just seems untrue, maybe if they're resisting, but these guys were non-violent.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well it is untrue, your voice is at the bottom...but they used that. These kids did not disperse when told to, so they used a less lethal

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Option. At the end of the day, physical contact can lead to broken bones, more aggression, and fighting. it is not like if the cop grabbed

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

an arm the kid would have gotten up and said yes sir and walked away. So using pepper spray was by far the lower force option. anyone who

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

start with minimal force and escalate as the situation determines. Pepper Spray is more likely less damaging than the inevitable brawl.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Why not? It's non-lethal.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So are lots of things not allowed for the police force.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@hybridcow Just curious what your thoughts are on this...I am personally curious on why pepper spray was a necessary tactic

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For one, it's safer for the officers. Note that the officers are severely outnumbered, meaning that if things turned physical, they'd lose.

11 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 4

This is a Berkeley protest... They coulda showed up in pajamas and bubble wands and still been just as safe

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

And you think macing the students was a good way to prevent it from turning physical?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So what? They're employees of the students.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 29

They're not employees of the students. And even if they were, that doesn't mean their lives aren't worth protecting.

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

I think it will be because by blocking the path thry are obstructing a police officer from effecting an arrest?

11 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

In the video, he literally steps over them to spray them..

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Try marching some 5+ people over a line of people wanting to set them free. Would not go over well.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Which is an offence

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

which is a big time offense.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

What do you think the pepper spray is for? It causes much less permanent damage than any other form of force available.

11 years ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 10

It causes less permanent damage than grabbing people and moving them? Why don't they just mace everyone they arrest then?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Yes, it does. Moving a person who doesn't want to be moved can cause severe muscle and joint strain that takes weeks to heal.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you really expect the people to move easily when grabbed? They're going to resist and with the escalation there are bound to be injuries

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought the MO was to become limp when they try to move you, surely that would also help to prevent injury?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That would be the common sense thing to do...but if you look at most protests that rarely, if ever, happens. People are devoted to the cause

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the students start fighting, the police aren't going to win. You realize that right?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I realise that a group of non-violent protestors aren't likely to start fighting police officers.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So what do you expect the police to do then? Simply sit there until the protesters get bored? They already asked the kids to move

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Capsaicins inflame the airways, causing swelling and restriction. Pepper sprays pose a genuine risk to people with respiratory conditions.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 16

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Apr 22, 2015 7:49 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

only causes cornea damage if fired from less than 6 inches. I think i can assume your not certified on the use of OC pepper spray.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Pepper spray causes its burning sensation in the eyes in part by damaging cells in the outer layer of the cornea. You don't know enough.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also, you obviously don't know what you're talking about either. This is crowd control spray designed to be used at a distance.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Unless it causes permanent blindness or respiratory problems that kill someone.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 17

Hey, that's their fault. They were asked if they understood, by remaining still they provided non-verbal consent.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

What would their reaction have been if they didn't understand? E.g. if they didn't speak the language?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

I would assume sight is a universal thing among regular, protesting students. That and a basic understanding of arm gestures.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If someone says they're going to shoot you if you don't give them your wallet, that's not consent. Even if they're a cop.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

Fantastic. That's a fantastic reply. That's exactly the situation we're discussing here. You deserve many, many upvotes for the contribution

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

If the goal is to get the students to move, how does incapacitating them help achieve that?

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

Makes it easier to carry them out of the way for one.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Not sure how people writing around in pain are easier to carry than those sitting quietly.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Except for the "remove [them] physically without the use of weapons" option for a not-physically-resisting group.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not necessarily too easy to start moving a wall of students when they don't co-operate.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They already were.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Definition of co-operation is sitting on the way not moving when you are asked to?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problems? 1) Students on a campus 2) Campus police were not authorized to make arrests or use pepper spray if peaceful 3) was peaceful.

11 years ago | Likes 277 Dislikes 110

Right to Protest covers the government, not third parties. Most universities are actually private entities and any protest can be illegal.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

SCOTUS ruled long ago that private entities organized by the Govt are PUBLIC entities in Law (park service, USPS, etc.).

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Agreed, however UC Davis is a public, i.e. government, University.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Your protest isn't going to be effective if your response to "You're peaceably breaking some rules" is "Ok, sorry, we're leaving now."

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Barricading is arguably not peaceful. If you're locked in a room or cell, that's imprisonment. A use of force to detain you.

11 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 32

exactly

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 8

Right, but there was room to walk around, and plenty. The fault was with the school leadership for not being clear about the mission.

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 12

Barricading is a non-violent form of protest. It is not actively violent. It is also used to provoke police violence, so that worked.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 18

if one of the intents is to "provoke police violence" as you put it, its not non-violent, its inciting violence

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

It is non-violent. It is also in the well developed bag of protest and "working with the police" tactics. It is non-violent, but ofcourse 1/

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Think sitting outside the White House - illegal and gets you arrested, but typically non violently.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's actually called civil disobedience. Willful non compliance, but not actually intended to incite violence.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

there are other goals as well. Protesting is a game with tactics on both sides. Tactics used to prove the other is wrong. Provocing 2/

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

police violence is one of those for protesters, to tilt public opinion. I'm not saying its right or wrong, but it is non-violent.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

1) The students were told to remove tents but did not. 2) Consequences are necessary for rule breaking 3) I see the circling as threatening.

11 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 118

"I see the circling as threatening." Well, you're not right.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 13

How is it threatening? They're all sitting. Also, the pepper spray used was the same grade as the kind used to stop mother fucking bears.

11 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 35

So if dozens of people inspired by violent protests surrounded you and chanted at you you would not feel threatened at all?

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 14

I've gotta lol @ the downvoters. Obviously people that've never been the target of an angry mob's attention before. It's nerve-racking.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

What violent protests?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

UC Davis was part of the OWS protests. Oakland's violent protests, in the same state, occurred just a month ahead of UC Davis.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I'm not saying you're wrong, but I am going to need some proof with that statement.

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Of the rank? Hold on this is going to take me a sec to find the report. But the band on the can is orange/red ranking it 1.3 or .7

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I got you " pepper spray can be used, but specifically refers to the MK-4 (a smaller canister)" Link to follow.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

http://reynosoreport.ucdavis.edu/reynoso-report.pdf Page 22 of the pdf (19 of the report) Section D.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

"If you let them go, we will let you leave". That seems like a threat to me. They will not allow the police to leave.

11 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 40

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Nov 13, 2017 5:58 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Which they must dutifully protect, they'd be even more screwed.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How can be the police be trapped if they are surrounding the students who are being peppersprayed, as can be seen in the picture ?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

the officers could have stepped over the students, if the students then prevented them physically from leaving, then they use force.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Standing up and moving out of the way so that they can pass through is not the same thing as physically attack an officer. I take it to mean

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that they will get out of the way when they say "We will let you leave," not that they will use violence to force the officers to stay.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In the same way that chaining yourself to a tree to stop a bulldozer is threatening the bulldozer, sure.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Last I checked, a bulldozer isn't a person and thus not capable of feeling threatened.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even if they're being threatening using 0.7 percent MC pepper spray on humans by campus police is idiotic and incorrect.

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 34

would you prefer they used bullets or batons? the police is the only agency legally allowed to detain individuals.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

As I said to someone else, I'm not trying to tell anyone what to think. I'm only trying to give more information.

11 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 8

They are LITERALLY holding hands and chanting. WHAT THE FUCK is threatening about that? It's the fucking DEFINITION of hippie bullshit.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

So pepper spraying kids to the face is the appropriate response?

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 16

Consequences as determined by a court of law, not a cop with a can of pepper spray.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seriously? "Consequences are necessary for rule breaking"? That's a horrible excuse/support for this..

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 8

I support consequences. That doesn't necessary mean these one exactly as executed.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your dad a cop or something?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

It concerns me that you see pepper spray as a consequence for "rule breaking" 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the police are authorized to use force to protect lives not to punish evil doers. 2/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gotta love America. Either do what the police tell you or they will torture you with chemicals.

11 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 28

as opposed to for example... lets say CANADA? as a canadian i have seen what the RCMP does to break up protests.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Those are called "laws" and torture is a bit of an exaggeration.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

Exaggeration? Have you ever been pepper sprayed? If not, I hope you get to experience it, then you can have an opinion

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

"Then you can have an opinion." Sounds tyrannical to me. And would you like me to link you to the torture posts on Imgur? Flaying, maybe?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here's the thing, when people are being peaceful and letting people go about their business, leave them alone.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

They weren't letting the police go about their business. They were effectively barricading the police in there.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 8

Only after the police tried to get them to leave their original location. The school higher ups rather screwed the pooch.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Oftentimes protests are meant to break rules. Civil disobedience is a perfectly legitmate and effective form of protest. The point is to 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

make the other side uncomfortable to force change or concessions. As long as it's peaceful and not disrupting passerby 3rd parties this type

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

of protest needn't be met with violence. I understand the police were doing their job. The students were doing their as protesters and in

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

a peaceable way. Pepper spray was unnecessary.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You see it as threatening because you adore authoritarianism. That's the only way one can consider physical assault a justified response.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

Not true, at all. My point is that there is more to the story. The cop did not walk up and start pepper spraying them.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You JUST said that you approved of the consequences dealt out for their "threatening" actions, which is endorsing authoritarianism.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. I said I approve of consequences. That does not mean these ones exactly as executed.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Careful! Many imgurians "hate both parties" and like to pretend they're libertarian when actually they worship authority.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lookt TheFirewall's comments. Holy. Fucking. Nazi.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They didnt do anything physically threatening to the police, it was a peaceful protest! Would you say the same about ghandis protests 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 33

They did a lot illegal and threatening. You try being encircled and trapped by a bunch of college kids and see how you feel

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 14

yeah man, i'm surrounded by college kids. they're sitting on the ground all around me chanting peacefully. holy shit I think I pissed myself

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Against bristish rule or MLK's speeches and marches for equal treatment? These were peaceful protests and youre just a contrarian

11 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 16

they are prefenting the police from moving.. and they made it i quite clear. surrounding them like that IS threatening

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

yes, people sitting on the ground chanting is threatening as hell. I went to a yoga class once, and now i'm scarred for life.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Around the 7:20 mark. "Let them go and we will continue to protest peacefully" Thats a threat. any day.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 11

Gandhi was arrested, and beimg arrested was part of his plan. MLK's speeches / marches were all legally executed, something these kids 1

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

couldn't manage to pull off. 2/2

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

A judge actually ruled that the cop was in the wrong.

11 years ago | Likes 1083 Dislikes 361

A judge also ruled casey Anthony innocent

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

No, she was found "not guilty" by a judge. There's a big difference.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Actually a jury of her peers acquitted her. Big difference.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

No "actually" a Judge did not but thanks for the contribution.

11 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 8

If you are failing to obey a lawful order, you can get OC'd for compliance.

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

A liberal judge who wanted to stay in office ruled that the police officer was in the wrong.

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 23

Police never truly get punished in America, probably just a tiny tap on the wrist.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Or he got $38k for the psychological damage HE suffered. (No, really. Look it up)

11 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 8

"Pike subsequently received 17,000 angry or threatening emails, 10,000 text messages, and hundreds of letters, causing him to suffer 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

from depression and anxiety and winning him a workers compensation claim settlement of $38,056" Relatively little for the BS he went through

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

he was fired, which is wrong, it's rare to see cops so calm & collected in such situations.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

He was fired like a year later, but that also has nothing to do with the workers comp.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't think the cop should be punished severely, but I still believe the students were the victims and pepper spray was uncalled for.

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 32

And your better solution would be?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Protesting on private property is against the law.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

That fully depends on the campus rules, and the property's status as a public college complicates the matter.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Isn't it a public school?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A judge also ruled that OJ was innocent.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

There was a policeman once just did his job and was never in any controversy in any way. Is that relevant? Not at all man.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Burden of proof being on the accuser is a bitch innit?

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

False. A jury found him "not guilty". There's a big difference.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I feel like the judge was in the wrong

11 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 31

Pepper spray is painful, but physically pretty harmless. Physically removing the students has a greater chance of causing physical injury.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

then it's settled

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Move! Why? Uhhhhh 'cause we want to drive a patrol car down this sidewalk. Huh?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

No, a commission was formed to investigate what occurred. They found that the police did use improper tactics by using the OC spray too 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 530 Dislikes 12

Somehow I'd like to see "downvoted into oblivion" replaced with "OC spray".

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

OC spray be gone, now available in 3 designer colors

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

shy too shy, hush-hush eye to eye

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Holy hell, not every day a Kajagoogoo reference shows up on Imgur.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Close, they were not sanctioned or any rulings against them. The police are taught to respond to a crowd closing in on them and moving 2/?

11 years ago | Likes 389 Dislikes 4

Boom! Facts. God I love them

11 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

Them, it doesn't mean they were wrong just that they used the spray too close. The use of force was necessary the usage of equipment not.3/3

11 years ago | Likes 357 Dislikes 7

This is the kind of comment I want to read. Bring elements to help me form a proper opinion. +1 to everything.

11 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 1

Thank ya! Everyone should be informed instead of joining in blindly on the cop bashing or cop hate.

11 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

So can fucking ANYBODY here give some actual suggestions to what the cops are supposed to do? I swear you guys have no idea how incredibly>

11 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

Dude, they don't let people like you on these commissions, and they'll most likely have the literal book on what to do. Or have wrote it

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The suggestion, that many depts are currently doing, is receiving training on how to respond to peaceful protests. This was rather knew 1/?

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

>patient&calm these cops are in this situation. Informing students before hand, multiple times even. This is not common in other countries..

11 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

i just read he was never issued a judgement or punished for anything

11 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 7

First excessive use of force, then cleared, then fired, now 38k workers compensation.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

He was never punished for excessive use of force. The 38K proves a judge ruled his firing to have been wrong.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There was no excessive use of force that is why it didn't stick. He broke protocol by having the OC spray to close. Studied in my Law class

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

A judge ruled that it was not excessive force used. Hence cleared. Under guise of arresting squatters the new ruling allowed his (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

escalation to use pepper spray on the people that took the place of those they had already been arrested. I cannot see how that is not (2/)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What was the reasoning? I'm curious.

11 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 7

Because there was all this bad publicity and the judge didn't want to be under more scrutiny by letting him off easy

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

It was an election season.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

Instead of spraying underprivileged black kids they sprayed privileged white kids. Check yo privileges.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 13

Going by some of the other replies here he was found to be standing too close while using the spray, their actions were fine otherwise.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Oh that's something I hadn't heard yet, interesting, thanks!

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It caused a media shitshow and punishing him for doing his job is better for judges than the judge losing reelection

11 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 24

IIRC the judge was appointed: not elected.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Excessive use of force. They could have picked the students up one at a time, (If other students tried to stop them, pepperstray)

11 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 13

They already did that, others sat in place, they were trying to take the first lot to a van. Not enough cops to pick up them all at once

11 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

That someone else have committed the same crime do not make others crime worse. The police was there to arrest squatters, (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Not dispense a crowd or protest. Protest are stile allowed in the US, well almost always now.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Fair enough. Though repeated warnings were given, and though I'm not sure that is entirely feasible, it would have been preferable.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Warning, about none non-lethal weapons, do not grant their use, but it should be noted that he was cleared on appeal.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh yea, I know, and again, I'm not saying it was the right course of action, just an understandable one. Interesting that he was cleared.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It could have something to do with subjecting peaceful protesters to what any thinking human being would call "torture."

11 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 61

HOLY SHIT there are a lot of people defending this action. Looks like we're fucked after all. neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerp

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Having been both sprayed and gassed (CS).. it isn't torture. Not even close. Yeah it sucks, but calling this torture undermines true torture

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

I wouldn't call that torture. They all have their faces covered, and while it still won't feel good, torture is much, much worse. Also, 1/3

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

It's hard for me to sympathize with the protesters after reading this post. Multiple broken laws and warnings, trapping police.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 6

THEY ARE SITTING DOWN AND CHANTING! What the fuck is it with you people and not being able to get cop dick down your throat fast enough?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

don't get me wrong, I'm not sure they deserve it, but reacting emotionally without looking at both sides is pointless, hence why I 2/3

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

wanted to know the reasoning the judge had. Would give better context. 3/3

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Oh, I looked at both sides; this is hardly unbiased, though. This is apologist fucking bullshit.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

So...? What's the story? Care to fill me in? Without being biased and emotional, as most people tend to.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Pepper spraying students who aren't hurting anyone. Being annoying and disobedient isn't grounds for that.

11 years ago | Likes 193 Dislikes 67

WRONG

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Actually it was using the pepper spray at too close a distance.

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Peaceful protest isn't constitutionally protected on private property

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 13

So arrest them.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

A public university isn't private property.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

UC campuses don't usually count as private property.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They still have rules like private property, which the protesters were breaking.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It was a UC campus, not private property.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They still have rules like private property, which the protesters were breaking.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Trespassing. Obstructing. Failure to comply.

11 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 22

1: They were students. 2: Obstruction implies there was no way to get around the protest, there was. 3: FTC is only valid in context that /1

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3/ police backup.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/ the police officers were issuing orders to vacate at the behest of the property owner, which they were not, campus security requested

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Still not grounds for pepper spray.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 11

Failure to comply. That's why tasers and pepper spray are used.... To gain compliance.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

Agreed, but obstruction of justice is still a criminal offence. They were preventing the cops from completing the arrests. Still iffy tho.

11 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 33

They were exercising their rights, and were non-violent.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

They were still obstructing justice. And there was an implied threat "if you let them go, we let you leave" could definitely be threatening,

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Which is an arrestable offense. So arrest them. Force is the last resort, or the laziest.

11 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

They had already arrested people, arresting more might not have been possible until they got those ones out of there.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Yes! Obstruction of justice. They're doing their job, how can some people be so stupid!

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Obstr. of Justice is a catch-all: it's not usually followed up by a charge in the case of protests.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. If people are breaking the law, you arrest them. Not assault or shoot them

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

They had already made arrests, they might not have been able to make any more with the manpower they had.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

they were breaking a law and were clearly warned multiple times.

11 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 28

So on your third speeding offense you just get pepper sprayed now. I mean, you were warned!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Pepper spray is ment for disarming potential dangerous enemies, not for clearing protesters that are sitting on the floor.

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

Yeah but police can't use whatever means they want to get their own way.

11 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 4

"Whatever means" isn't what they used though. Pepper spray was designed to be a deterrent, not a weapon. That's what it is.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

no, students can't use whatever means they want to get their way. Why are people so adamant to defend these stupid kids? Own you BS behavior

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The least used means is time. Police can always let folks decide to leave on their own.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3