title

Jun 12, 2016 4:20 PM

DeathByGif

Views

39812

Likes

1399

Dislikes

87

Don't look at me, I've never shot anyone

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

If we could shoot the bad guys in large quantities, itd be better.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They won't just stop shooting, the only thing that will stop lunatics like this is to kill them and stop them before they hurt anybody.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If only people would stop making these dumb posts to get their little bit of attention out of this tragedy

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

They'll stop when it doesn't work.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a gay guy, who have we shot? WHAT THE FUCK DID WE EVER DO to warrant being harassed, beaten and just outright massacred?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

I hope you all know the aliens see us as that retarded planet that keeps punching itself in the face.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

But the gay people shot blanks.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Naah...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who is "we"?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't give civilians guns. Problem solved.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This is unavoidable when our country irresponsibility throws more guns at a gun epidemic.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 22

I think you may know little about actual guns or gun laws

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It seems like you are the uneducated one in this matter

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Unless you invent a lightning cannon. I think we can all agree the inventor of a lightning cannon deserves a murder or two.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I think this is more directed at you, America.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 12

comment

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

SO YOU ADMIT TO SHOOTING PEOPLE?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a crazy world we live in. I'm waiting for people to say "that's what they get for being gay." I know it's coming.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

wstboro baptit church said the shooter was sent by god if im not mistaken

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the fuck is wrong with my keyboard

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are gonna be torn between that and hating the guy for being Muslim.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I wondered this too, how many ultra conservatives said "well had they repented and gone straight they wouldn't be dead now would they?"

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

I know a lot of religious types are thinking it. Most of them are probably closeted homosexuals themselves.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

As an Aussie, what did I miss

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

100 people shot in an night club in Florida, USA. 50 confirmed dead so far.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And this comes 3 days after ISIS claimed it would attack Florida.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Muslim took a gay night club hostage, pledged allegiance to ISIS in a 911 call, then murdered 50+ people and wounded 52+ more.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There was a mass shooting in Orlando FL. 50 dead, 53 in hospital. Worst shooting in recent US history

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Jesus Christ. It's as if America hears "worst shooting in history" as a challenge.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, And then only a couple days ago Christina Grimmie was shot and killed in FL. It's outrageous! This needs to stop :'(

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If radical Islam* could stop that'd be great

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 13

Everyone*

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It's not just radical Muslims that commit mass murders...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You're right my bad. Only a vast majority of them lately

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now if we could just get ISIS onboard.

10 years ago | Likes 210 Dislikes 5

*Americans

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 12

nah, Chicago needs to be the flagship. For a gun free city there sure are a lot of shootings.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe they didn't see this meme?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Please keep them off of me, thanks.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think they got the memo. . .

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't worry I'm on my way to Syria and I'm gonna ask them very nicely wish me luck

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So we can sink that mutherfucker...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I would not want ISIS onboard because im sure they would blow that up too.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No, ISIS members should shoot people. They should just start with themselves first. About 3-4 12mm rounds to the temple should do it.

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

But what if they built resistance shooting themselves with smaller calibers?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Logistically speaking 3-4 might prove difficult. Start small with 1, see where that gets us.

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

It's nice to have achievable stretch goals. You're obviously a good manager.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure its bomb time. Just wipe them out. What are we waiting for?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

ISIS is a virus. The more you try to attack it the more it spreads. Anyone can join ISIS just by pledging their allegiance.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The shitbag in orlando called 911 and pledged his allegiance then went to go shoot up the club.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the fact that isis isnt in any single spot. you know its not a country right?? ive had to explain that a few times..

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Whoa, its not a country ?? Mindsplosion, you are such a scholar.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe ban guns for a start...

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 26

I think banning guns is pretty extreme. Regulation? Sure. Banning? That is stupid.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Remember what happened in Paris and Brussels? Use your head before you make an ignorant remark

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Good luck, pal.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're joking right?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

They can. Over our dead bodies. Because a lot of the population won't abide

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Idiot

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Really ? Amigo, in u.s. it's easier to get guns than it is to get a good education...

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

You get free school untill you are 18. Get the hell out of here with that ignorance

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How about we make the education system better then? Instead of banning guns because one in a million are lunatics

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Lot easier said than done

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And if you look at gun homicides, its actually 1 in ten million.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Lol true though. Over 100 MILLION people have guns in the US. And how many turn out to be killers? 0.0001% is the rounded answer.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Same could be said for the Muslim population.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not sure I believe this number. Where did you find it?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"If only law-abiding people all drinking and dancing in crowded clubs all had guns strapped to them, they'd all be safer" - NRA, probably

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 36

It's a misdemeanor to carry a firearm in an establishment that serves alcohol. The NRA knows this.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because if someone wanted to commit terrorism they wouldn't get a gun illegally...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It'd be harder to get and easier to catch if we had stricter laws. And if high cap mags weren't available that'd save lives too

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

But.. but.. it was a gun-fre zone!!! He can't have a gun there!

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

If your answer is to ban guns then when do we have the conversation about banning Muslims?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

Have we really got to the point where we are comparing the rights of inanimate ojects to people?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Like corporations? Such as Remington, Smith & Wesson, R J Reynolds, Halliburton? Some folks value things over people; and money above all

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Inanimate objects don't have rights. People have rights which includes defense. A right in which guns are used 764,000 times each year.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's America. Guns are a holy sacrament way more important than people. You don't want tyranny from the King of England do you?!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only people talking about outright banning guns are wild-eyed gun nuts regurgitating tiresome NRA propaganda. Fear is a great lever.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Fun fact, did you know the NRA trained African Americans to use firearms while they were being persecuted by the KKK in the 60's?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And the Republicans also used championship civil rights 50 years ago; now they don't. What a feeble attempt to make a point…

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah you're right. Democrats aren't standing on dead bodies preaching gun control in Orlando right now.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

As opposed to standing on dead bodies humping guns and putting that fetish above human life

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Gun control does not mean banning all guns.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'll point out that when radical Muslims tried this shit in Texas they DID get shot by citizens packing guns.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Don't muddle the arguments with your facts.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I didn't hear about that. Have a link?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll point out that Texas has more gun deaths per capita than the USA national average.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'll wait for your source and an explanation as to why that matters.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And Utah has less, and they have no gun control. DC is much more, and they have super strict laws.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No one is safe from the evil within the hearts of bad men. Laws of man, of life, do not apply.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

yeah dude! let's take criminal law and bin it!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No one said that. Laws keep law abiding people in check. Clearly those don't apply to everyone.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But we have and can pass laws that make people safer. Outlawing lead paint. Airbags. Seat belts. Gun control (Background checks, etc) .

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Laws don't change the heart of a man intent on evil things, it only gives everyone the right to enact their moral revenge after the fact.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Oh right because there are zero background checks. Those 4473 forms just fill themselves out with magic I guess.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Some people feel safer with a gun on their hip, others don't.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Some people feel safer driving than flying. But it's possible to statistically prove that something is more of a safety hazard than benefit.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

Regardless of whether driving or flying is safer, in a free state, you can and should be allowed to do either.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So is it an assault on freedom if I can't have a car to drive or a helicopter to fly or a gun without having to register it and get license?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well if the right to drive cars or fly helicopters was enumerated in the central document of your nations' law, maybe it would be.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you're gonna talk stats then you can't possibly support gun control. There are at least 764,000 legal defensive gun uses per year.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Another stat: having a gun in the home greatly increases the likelihood that you or someone you love will be killed in a home invasion.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

The methodology used in that "study" was massively flawed and has been discredited many times.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

This does not point to a cause and effect relationship between gun ownership and death by gun use.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They did not control general safety of the community surveyed, which correlates with both gun ownership and gun violence.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

NO. That stat reads "you are more likely to die from 'gun violence' " - ie suicide.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Also, that isn't even the conclusion that was reached.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

In essence, the study found that, in bad neighborhoods, you're more likely to 1.) get shot and 2.) own a gun to protect yourself.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Damn gun control in France really worked

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

They have far less gun death and crime per capita than the USA, so yes, you're right that gun control works.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

My point was it doesn't stop mass shooting. Criminals do not follow laws.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Criminals absolutely are affected by laws. If something is heavily regulated, it's harder or for them to get.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

lol what about weed then?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Notice how explosives are much more regulated than guns in the USA. And do we have a lot more bomb deaths or gun deaths? Regulations matter.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

the guy had a explosive device attached to him its real easy to make a bomb

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was one gun man, had their been a few conceal carries I guarantee far fewer people would have died. Not to mention Orlando is another 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 12

Liberal bastion of people who are afraid of guns and not the bad guys who hold them.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

You don't know where is shooting will occur. So you have to put "a few concealed carries" is in EVERY club.guarantee MORE death in that case

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Permitted concealed holders have one of, if not the lowest, group of gun related crime rates. Equal or better than police officers. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3/3. Realistically they should have had armed security to some extent, and metal detectors if it's a high-risk area of the city.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your argument is idiotic, it is a CHOICE to conceal carry. When someone chooses do so they know the risks and benefits. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can tell by your argument you literally understand nothing about how firearms function and that you have little to no experience with them

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I can tell by your argument you literally know nothing about human nature, public safety, statistics, or how good intentions can go wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Choosing to do something, and knowing the risks are two completely different things. People are not perfect. More people w guns=more deaths

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2