500 pts · February 24, 2013
Click the "Share" button below the video, then "Embed" and congratulations, no adverts ever again, and no adblock required. You're welcome.
I guess we have different ideas on what we class as expensive. I just looked it up, a medium basic is £140. I wouldn't call that cheap.
in the UK as well as the rest of the world, but true to form, you Yanks don't see anything further than your precious US of A. Get fucked
just about having hotter days, GW lead to any number of things like droughts, fires, changes in ecosystems ALL of which we are experiencing
warming for a reason, it affects EVERYONE. We have seen temperatures over 40C in England this year, the hottest ever recorded. AND, its not
refuse to just admit you were wrong and instead dig that hole ever deeper, clutching at whatever straw you can. Also, its called GLOBAL
started. I never once said anything about you original point RE: Coal dust, I corrected you on you woeful misunderstanding of Meltdowns. You
I absolutely DO care about Global warming, when did I EVER say that. You have totally lost all train of thought on how this coversation
What even is your fucking point??!! You keep pivoting every message incoherently. I'm not responding anymore. Brick...fucking....wall.
I live in England, you could count how many AC we have in this country on one hand. You're level of ignorance is staggering.
Okay Mr "I tried to flex saying I work at MIT as if it has any bearing whatsoever on being qualified to talk about Nuclear reactors". Yanks.
And I work at Sizewell NPS, Suffolk. As did my father, and my father in-law. Which do you think is more relevant? Brick Wall.
Mate, I'm done trying to make you see sense, its like talking to a brick wall. Pretty much everything you have said has been ridiculous.
The two are NOT comparable, one isotope is nothing like another, but you would know that IF YOU HAD ANY IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
NUCLEAR TESTING AND A NUCLEAR MELTDOWNS ARENT THE SAME THING! One uses a fuel with a half live of minutes/few days, the other up2 20,000yrs.
water as well as the compounding affects it would have had on the rest of the world. Again, you have zero idea what you are talking about.
we would even be having this conversation as it would be common knowledge that the vast majority of Western Europe has contamintated ground
inhospitable to organic life for +20,00 years. We were EXTREMELY fortunate that the Chernobyl meltdown was able to be contained, if it wasnt
the same thing as contaminating the ground water supply to an ENTIRE Continent, or the same as being left with a reactor that will be
Nuclear testing isn't the same as a meltdown, you are just copy/pasting from Wiki. Radioactive material put "into the atmosphere" is NOT
You can actually hear him running away after the explosion if you have headphones on.
There were multiple smaller explosions before the main one, that was one of them. The person very likely survived that one.
There have been exactly zero meltdowns worse than Chernobyl, the fallout from Reactor 4 was 400x greater than Hiroshima. Educate yourself.
disaster if it were ever to happen again and we don't get so lucky a second time. Theres a reason why plants are so heavily protected.
ridiculous. Watch the TV mini series "Chernobyl", not only is it a great watch, it will also open your eyes to the true potential of such a
of people. Do I think Nuclear is better than hydrocarbons, yes, definitely. But to trivialize a meltdown to almost a non issue is beyond
big enough water supply it could directly and indirectly lead to the deaths in the billions, not to mention the displacement of millions
be habitable for 20,000 years. A nuclear meltdown worse than Chernobyl would be catastrophic for the entire planet, if it contaminated a
their lives to contain the reactor. The exclusion zone for Chernobyl is also 1000 square miles which is a little more than 10. It also wont
affected the rest of the world. We should all count ourselves lucky enough men and woman were willing to sacrifice their health and even
Click the "Share" button below the video, then "Embed" and congratulations, no adverts ever again, and no adblock required. You're welcome.
I guess we have different ideas on what we class as expensive. I just looked it up, a medium basic is £140. I wouldn't call that cheap.
in the UK as well as the rest of the world, but true to form, you Yanks don't see anything further than your precious US of A. Get fucked
just about having hotter days, GW lead to any number of things like droughts, fires, changes in ecosystems ALL of which we are experiencing
warming for a reason, it affects EVERYONE. We have seen temperatures over 40C in England this year, the hottest ever recorded. AND, its not
refuse to just admit you were wrong and instead dig that hole ever deeper, clutching at whatever straw you can. Also, its called GLOBAL
started. I never once said anything about you original point RE: Coal dust, I corrected you on you woeful misunderstanding of Meltdowns. You
I absolutely DO care about Global warming, when did I EVER say that. You have totally lost all train of thought on how this coversation
What even is your fucking point??!! You keep pivoting every message incoherently. I'm not responding anymore. Brick...fucking....wall.
I live in England, you could count how many AC we have in this country on one hand. You're level of ignorance is staggering.
Okay Mr "I tried to flex saying I work at MIT as if it has any bearing whatsoever on being qualified to talk about Nuclear reactors". Yanks.
And I work at Sizewell NPS, Suffolk. As did my father, and my father in-law. Which do you think is more relevant? Brick Wall.
Mate, I'm done trying to make you see sense, its like talking to a brick wall. Pretty much everything you have said has been ridiculous.
The two are NOT comparable, one isotope is nothing like another, but you would know that IF YOU HAD ANY IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
NUCLEAR TESTING AND A NUCLEAR MELTDOWNS ARENT THE SAME THING! One uses a fuel with a half live of minutes/few days, the other up2 20,000yrs.
water as well as the compounding affects it would have had on the rest of the world. Again, you have zero idea what you are talking about.
we would even be having this conversation as it would be common knowledge that the vast majority of Western Europe has contamintated ground
inhospitable to organic life for +20,00 years. We were EXTREMELY fortunate that the Chernobyl meltdown was able to be contained, if it wasnt
the same thing as contaminating the ground water supply to an ENTIRE Continent, or the same as being left with a reactor that will be
Nuclear testing isn't the same as a meltdown, you are just copy/pasting from Wiki. Radioactive material put "into the atmosphere" is NOT
You can actually hear him running away after the explosion if you have headphones on.
There were multiple smaller explosions before the main one, that was one of them. The person very likely survived that one.
There have been exactly zero meltdowns worse than Chernobyl, the fallout from Reactor 4 was 400x greater than Hiroshima. Educate yourself.
disaster if it were ever to happen again and we don't get so lucky a second time. Theres a reason why plants are so heavily protected.
ridiculous. Watch the TV mini series "Chernobyl", not only is it a great watch, it will also open your eyes to the true potential of such a
of people. Do I think Nuclear is better than hydrocarbons, yes, definitely. But to trivialize a meltdown to almost a non issue is beyond
big enough water supply it could directly and indirectly lead to the deaths in the billions, not to mention the displacement of millions
be habitable for 20,000 years. A nuclear meltdown worse than Chernobyl would be catastrophic for the entire planet, if it contaminated a
their lives to contain the reactor. The exclusion zone for Chernobyl is also 1000 square miles which is a little more than 10. It also wont
affected the rest of the world. We should all count ourselves lucky enough men and woman were willing to sacrifice their health and even