3886 pts ยท February 4, 2014
"Something about myself"
The campaign should continue as planned, but the consequences of unwanted actions needs to happen at a time that is most inconvenient to the player characters. Otherwise they won't learn. Or at least that's how I do it...
I didn't really pay attention to that. I'm not saying you're incorrect, just that I personally didn't notice it.
Yeah, I wouldn't mind if they replaced him. And like you said, it would be easy. Just get someone that can produce at least a vaguely similar voice and nobody will notice anything different.
Even if you have an actual, legitimate point to make, saying things like "take his dick out long enough to take a deep breath" will make everyone lose all interest in your point.
Best part was that even when I knew beforehand that he is Skeletor, I didn't remember or notice it while watching. You didn't really realize it's him. He basically wasn't in the movie.
Well, good news, canonically Mystique is both.
I'm using the words "win" and "lose" so even you can understand the concepts. I've noticed that if I try to use intelligent words, you keep getting confused and start answering some imaginary conversations you had.And your inability to provide counterproof means I won that argument. I proved my point, you couldn't prove yours.
If you WERE Finnish, you'd have known what the words "higher education" meant before I had to teach them to you (since higher education is just a common thing here). You clearly didn't know that since you misunderstood me saying "I have higher education" to mean that I said "I have higher education than you". And you couldn't even admit that you made that mistake, which further provides proof of your narcissism.
I'm not the one of us inserting himself as the saviour when saying things like "americans need foreigners like me to come and save them".
So, no you can't, proving it was a pathetic insult from a pathetic, self-professed gaslighter.
What bigotry have I done? I'm saying that I have done ZERO bigotry. You could prove me wrong here by showing a comment of mine which shows bigotry, but we both know you won't because you just use the word "bigot" as a childish insult. If your next comment does't show my comment with "bigotry", I know I'm 100% right about you.
Sorry, but you are dumb. We've already established this. And your inability to provide proof that you've done it further provides proof that you've lied about the whole thing.
What I've said is that you keep bringing some things up, even after they been left behind, which brings up the idea that they bother you. It's not a "standard" or some stupid thing like that. It's just a thing that clearly bothers you, specifically. Like the hero complex thing really got to you, since you keep bringing it up in unrelated context.
I never said that. You are just too stupid to understand the original meaning of my message and then you pervert the message until you understand something, which changes the whole thing. You constantly create these false narratives so you can give a retort to some imagined conversation you've had.
I'm truly sorry if you project onto me the words "you mommy never loved you". Nobody should have to experience that.
What is the question that I didn't answer?
I'm 100% certain that every single childish insult you've thrown my way is something someone has called you. And you appropriating my use of word "stupid" just provides further proof for that theory. But it doesn't matter how many childish insults you throw my way, they won't transfer away from you.
You've come up with a list of pathetic excuses for why you won't prove your words. It doesn't matter what lame excuse you say, if you can't prove that your words are true for whatever reason, then you are unable to do so. Simple.
I have already provided proof of having a wife. Further proof would only dox myself or my wife and I don't want to do that while I'm talking to unhinged person on the internet (I'm referring to you). Me having a wife or not doesn't affect anything, so there is no need to provide further proof. You have ZERO reason to doubt the existance of my wife, other than you are probably a lonely incel and you can't stand the idea that me, who correctly calls out on your shit, has a loving relationship.
What lies I tell constantly? You can't say? Well, that's not surprising, since you lied about me having to lie constantly.I don't think you even understand how much of a horrible person it makes you when you use the words: "It really is a good thing your mother is dead." I've reported you for that one.
"But then again, we have already established long ago that don't even know what it means to quote someone." I seem to have missed the word "you" in there. See, this is how us adults admit mistakes. You should take a note how it is done. It's not embarassing admitting that you've made a simple typo. But you can't even admit your typos.
I bragged about it because you're a dumbass who is really easy to manipulate. I don't need to control stupid conversation with morons on the internet. You keep bringing up my "need" for control, which kinda implies that it's what you think. Do you feel the need to have control over people? Well, sorry to burst your bubble, but you're not smart enough to do that.
Where did you prove it?
Where did I do that? Can you show that? No? Thought so, because it was a lie from you. You're just a little weasel who makes up stuff all the time and when asked, cannot provide proof of anything, since all you do is lie. Pathetic.Shouldn't you be running away, since I've "gotten boring"? You said you would leave since I wasn't "entertaining".
"Thanks for prove correct again." is not a correct sentence. Would you like to try again? But you said that you were going to run away since I stopped being "entertaining", but then you stuck around like a parasite. Now you claim again I'm boring, but still I don't see you running away like you said you would do if I wasn't "entertaining".
Sure, "Just wont. Solely because it triggers you." We both know you can't do it because it's a 100% a lie that you've "proven" that I've used bigotry. Now, you could EASILY prove me wrong and show where you've proven it, but we both know you won't do it, because you've lied about the whole thing. You CAN'T do it, because your "proof" doesn't exist. And you keep coming up with lame excuses why you "won't" do it just proves I'm correct.
But oh man. I think we found another one of your trigger words: "control". You constantly claim I need to be in control, but that's clearly another one of your projections. You feel the need to be in control of even a stupid conversation on the internet, which is why you try to gaslight people.
"I have no need to be in control of a conversation with a dumbass like you." is a completely different thing than "I feel no need to control people". But then again, we have already established long ago that don't even know what it means to quote someone. And you misquoting me to create some false narrative that you can then try to take control of is on par of who you are as a person.
Oh, you have done it? The prove it. Oh, you can't? Didn't think so.
I don't need to "turn off" anything. I'm not a self-professed gaslighter like you, who makes lies about other peoples parents being abusive or addicts. Or make lies about other people's nationalities being "stereotypically slow". I don't do any of those things. But you DO.Oh, I'm boring? Weren't you going to run away, because I wasn't "entertaining"? I don't see you running away. Why is that?
The campaign should continue as planned, but the consequences of unwanted actions needs to happen at a time that is most inconvenient to the player characters. Otherwise they won't learn. Or at least that's how I do it...
I didn't really pay attention to that. I'm not saying you're incorrect, just that I personally didn't notice it.
Yeah, I wouldn't mind if they replaced him. And like you said, it would be easy. Just get someone that can produce at least a vaguely similar voice and nobody will notice anything different.
Even if you have an actual, legitimate point to make, saying things like "take his dick out long enough to take a deep breath" will make everyone lose all interest in your point.
Best part was that even when I knew beforehand that he is Skeletor, I didn't remember or notice it while watching. You didn't really realize it's him. He basically wasn't in the movie.
Well, good news, canonically Mystique is both.
I'm using the words "win" and "lose" so even you can understand the concepts. I've noticed that if I try to use intelligent words, you keep getting confused and start answering some imaginary conversations you had.
And your inability to provide counterproof means I won that argument. I proved my point, you couldn't prove yours.
If you WERE Finnish, you'd have known what the words "higher education" meant before I had to teach them to you (since higher education is just a common thing here). You clearly didn't know that since you misunderstood me saying "I have higher education" to mean that I said "I have higher education than you". And you couldn't even admit that you made that mistake, which further provides proof of your narcissism.
I'm not the one of us inserting himself as the saviour when saying things like "americans need foreigners like me to come and save them".
So, no you can't, proving it was a pathetic insult from a pathetic, self-professed gaslighter.
What bigotry have I done? I'm saying that I have done ZERO bigotry. You could prove me wrong here by showing a comment of mine which shows bigotry, but we both know you won't because you just use the word "bigot" as a childish insult. If your next comment does't show my comment with "bigotry", I know I'm 100% right about you.
Sorry, but you are dumb. We've already established this. And your inability to provide proof that you've done it further provides proof that you've lied about the whole thing.
What I've said is that you keep bringing some things up, even after they been left behind, which brings up the idea that they bother you. It's not a "standard" or some stupid thing like that. It's just a thing that clearly bothers you, specifically. Like the hero complex thing really got to you, since you keep bringing it up in unrelated context.
I never said that. You are just too stupid to understand the original meaning of my message and then you pervert the message until you understand something, which changes the whole thing. You constantly create these false narratives so you can give a retort to some imagined conversation you've had.
I'm truly sorry if you project onto me the words "you mommy never loved you". Nobody should have to experience that.
What is the question that I didn't answer?
I'm 100% certain that every single childish insult you've thrown my way is something someone has called you. And you appropriating my use of word "stupid" just provides further proof for that theory. But it doesn't matter how many childish insults you throw my way, they won't transfer away from you.
You've come up with a list of pathetic excuses for why you won't prove your words. It doesn't matter what lame excuse you say, if you can't prove that your words are true for whatever reason, then you are unable to do so. Simple.
I have already provided proof of having a wife. Further proof would only dox myself or my wife and I don't want to do that while I'm talking to unhinged person on the internet (I'm referring to you). Me having a wife or not doesn't affect anything, so there is no need to provide further proof. You have ZERO reason to doubt the existance of my wife, other than you are probably a lonely incel and you can't stand the idea that me, who correctly calls out on your shit, has a loving relationship.
What lies I tell constantly? You can't say? Well, that's not surprising, since you lied about me having to lie constantly.
I don't think you even understand how much of a horrible person it makes you when you use the words: "It really is a good thing your mother is dead." I've reported you for that one.
"But then again, we have already established long ago that don't even know what it means to quote someone." I seem to have missed the word "you" in there. See, this is how us adults admit mistakes. You should take a note how it is done. It's not embarassing admitting that you've made a simple typo. But you can't even admit your typos.
I bragged about it because you're a dumbass who is really easy to manipulate. I don't need to control stupid conversation with morons on the internet. You keep bringing up my "need" for control, which kinda implies that it's what you think. Do you feel the need to have control over people? Well, sorry to burst your bubble, but you're not smart enough to do that.
Where did you prove it?
Where did I do that? Can you show that? No? Thought so, because it was a lie from you. You're just a little weasel who makes up stuff all the time and when asked, cannot provide proof of anything, since all you do is lie. Pathetic.
Shouldn't you be running away, since I've "gotten boring"? You said you would leave since I wasn't "entertaining".
"Thanks for prove correct again." is not a correct sentence. Would you like to try again? But you said that you were going to run away since I stopped being "entertaining", but then you stuck around like a parasite. Now you claim again I'm boring, but still I don't see you running away like you said you would do if I wasn't "entertaining".
Sure, "Just wont. Solely because it triggers you." We both know you can't do it because it's a 100% a lie that you've "proven" that I've used bigotry. Now, you could EASILY prove me wrong and show where you've proven it, but we both know you won't do it, because you've lied about the whole thing. You CAN'T do it, because your "proof" doesn't exist. And you keep coming up with lame excuses why you "won't" do it just proves I'm correct.
But oh man. I think we found another one of your trigger words: "control". You constantly claim I need to be in control, but that's clearly another one of your projections. You feel the need to be in control of even a stupid conversation on the internet, which is why you try to gaslight people.
"I have no need to be in control of a conversation with a dumbass like you." is a completely different thing than "I feel no need to control people". But then again, we have already established long ago that don't even know what it means to quote someone. And you misquoting me to create some false narrative that you can then try to take control of is on par of who you are as a person.
Oh, you have done it? The prove it. Oh, you can't? Didn't think so.
I don't need to "turn off" anything. I'm not a self-professed gaslighter like you, who makes lies about other peoples parents being abusive or addicts. Or make lies about other people's nationalities being "stereotypically slow". I don't do any of those things. But you DO.
Oh, I'm boring? Weren't you going to run away, because I wasn't "entertaining"? I don't see you running away. Why is that?