egumption

982 pts ยท March 4, 2013


It's the only starting place, no? You won't understand the depths of grace if you don't understand you're a sinner in need of it.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the back line a bit too much. His pressing gave De Bruyne the space to set up Lukaku's goal. But Yedlin will become good soon.

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

years when Yedlin has more experience he will be great. Yedlin's still raw, you could see that he pressed up too often, exposing (4)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

experienced RB in a heartbeat. Adding Yedlin now would just be too many young RBs when experience would help immensely. Maybe in a few (3)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

to sign Debuchy from Newcastle to coach the young ones more. If Bellerin or Jenkinson move on I'd take Yedlin to learn from an (2)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yedlin at Arsenal would be cool at some point, but would be one too many young RBs on roster: Jenkinson and Bellerin. The ideal would be (1)

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Classic Schmosby!!

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Upvote for Dumb and Dumber. "PILLS ARE GOOD, PILLS ARE GOOD!!!"

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

equivalent is the first derivative being positive, but the second derivative is non-positive. Increasing at a decreasing rate. 5/5

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

making the game progress slower. They all overall contribute positively, but the impact of the player on the margin decreases. The math 4/?

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

negative, though. That is what you are getting at. On the margin, an added participant's marginal contribution is negative since they're 3/?

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

isn't making overall forward progress with however many people are participating. The change in marginal contribution of a new player is 2/?

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, because they're still (overall) making forward progress. You'll go faster in a single person game, but that's not to say the game 1/?

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm an Econ PhD (I do more theoretical modeling than empirical, but do both), hence the long lecture. Just to clarify your point. 7/7

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

they aren't). Total output/progress for TPP is always increasing, but the rate at which it is increasing is approaching 0. That's DMP. 6/?

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

because negative marginal product would imply that they're going backwards, and they'd be at the beginning of the game by now (which 5/?

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

...even if it is extremely slowly. The marginal product of an extra participant is basically zero for TPP. It's not negative, though, 4/?

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

In the case of TPP, it's not even true that you get "negative" output from the next participant because they're still moving forward... 3/?

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

the next unit of input will actually yield negative returns (it depends on the functional form). Typically it just approaches zero. 2/?

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well...sort of. All DMP implies is that the next unit of input contributes less than the previous unit. It doesn't necessarily mean that 1/?

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

is v.11, though: we are forgiven and made righteous in Jesus. Paul invokes the name of Jesus to remind them to turn from unrighteousness (2)

12 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Paul lists homosexuality as unrighteousness in 1 Cor 6:9-10. Read the full list and verses for context. The most important verse here (1/2)

12 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

such last. many forever. great eternal.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cleverly made. The Hobbit clips are from An Unexpected Journey, and the DW clips seem to be from "Tooth & Claw," if my memory serves me.

12 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

43214, yup!

12 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Start with 2005's "Rose" then skip to "Dalek." "Rose" is eh but it's the first episode so you have to. "Dalek" is the first good episode.

13 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The best episodes in Series 1 are "Dalek," "The Empty Child" / "The Doctor Dances," so you have to get to ep. 6 for it to start cooking.

13 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Surprisingly accurate, especially when you get into econometrics.

13 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0