seriouslessly

505 pts · March 25, 2017


Your bigotry isn’t allowing you to see your hypocrisy.

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

“Settlers” imply settling on an uninhabited region. Colonizing/invading implies, more accurately, the act of removing someone else from that land.

1 week ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You’re either a terrible propagandist or a misinformed historian. Tell us which one so that we may help you appropriately.

2 weeks ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It’s like learning that your family owns slaves on its plantation and you just stay there because it’s more “convenient”.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The issue is the bully, not the victim. Unfortunately the bully here is the USA (via Israel/IOF-backed “settlers”). Even entire non-apartheid countries that fight back have little effectiveness against this huge bully.
This brave young journalist + countless others have attempted to document the disgusting and aggressive nature of the IOF/Israelis; you simply don’t hear of them as often as you do the “fighting back” of the Palestinians. It is plastered all over the world as constant propaganda.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All you seem to be doing is hurting others with disabilities. I’m going to go ahead and wager you aren’t with many disabilities and surrounded by mountains of privilege. I’m hoping that this convo is one you don’t run from but rather revisit in one of your hyper-focused episodes and then turn it into a learning experience. You’re either at least 1 full iteration of genius beyond the average (and you constantly have something to show for it) or you’re extremely privileged and you will learn :) GL

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I implore you to either teach us how or to explain your privilege. Either you’ve gamed the system and are blissfully unaware of your extreme genius, or you’re blissfully unaware of the privilege you’re surrounded by.

2 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Angry and loud and ignorant. I feel sorry for you.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I guess you’re adverse to reading and/or learning? So just say whatever mental dribble comes out of those ignorant lips ??

3 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh no, a very small person with less to add than a bot?

3 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Don’t be a Zionist. Don’t go to Israel. Leave.

3 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think you’re right in trying to describe the empathy necessary to eventually reconcile here… the issue is that we are currently in the midst of the genocide and the perpetrators and their enablers (like this unfortunate woman) need to be stopped. PERIOD. Sometimes it’s too hard (or simply too complicated for mine and these other replies) to find ways stop it through kindness; however, what you’re describing (empathy) is ABSOLUTELY necessary - just not right now DURING the genocide. Stop first.

4 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What is wrong with this exactly? It’s explained that the clip comes from a while ago - it just shows that plans were always around to mess with the area.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As deranged and misinformed as you are, I still feel sorry for you. Nobody deserves to be this mislead. I hope you get better soon!
I’m willing to help if you’re willing to hear anything and letting it sit for a minute.

5 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Where is this post irrational? Where is it antisemitic?

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Try to hear yourself “justify” … it’s completely illogical. If you would like help with that then simply ask questions; however, as long as you assert your misguided truths, expect people to correct you. Would you like help to understand the fallacies?

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can see your misguided explanation after some other comment here. Are you implying that US Democratic Party civilian voters should be attacked in similar ways as Democratic Party active duty military should? Especially if there isn’t a war… just some “targeted strikes”? Are you familiar with why the Geneva conventions exist … or that they even exist ?? The headline is only objective to genocidal maniacs. Does that make sense?

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly! Hamas is a tool used by ignorant and evil people. Hamas never existed until the terrorist state of Israel was invented in 1948 - even then, not until many decades of genocide were underway. There were other factions of rebellion that came before them (each being quite easily explained given the ongoing genocide during their inceptions too) so using hamas, a very recent and Israeli-funded faction, to defend any pro-Israeli endeavour is lazy misinformation and straight-up propaganda.

6 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Respectfully, what’s the difference? (And I apologize ahead of time in case this is too personal for a response)

6 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

What’s wrong with anti-Israel sentiments? Do you love that Israel is actively committing at least one genocide?

6 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I don’t think that’s what’s happening here. It clearly states “zionists” not Jews and “almost all” which is statistically correct. I understand your reservations when it comes to anger and division through hyperbole but this is not it. This is the opposite - this is more akin to the Epstein files being released and people trying to justify the atrocities instead of call them out because of the privileged continual regurgitation of propaganda.

7 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

In the probably butchered words of a funny imgurian “tomorrow morning, find the nearest school bus and just get on it, please!”

7 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

“Maybe if they voted for a little less genocide or a different flavour of genocide we would respect them and their murdered family/friends a bit more”… just wow….
(Not to mention your voting math is very wrong)

7 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Do you honestly believe your words or are you just trolling? Because if you’re being serious and you’re simply regurgitating what you’ve been told I’d love to try and understand where you went wrong - or where I’m wrong - if you’re interested. Why not start where you think it’s relevant (year in history) and the events that precipitate your conclusion?

7 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you always couple your misinformation with illogical analogies? If you don’t know what’s going on you can ask questions, you don’t have to pretend.

7 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I get that you are certainly misinformed, but why are you so heartless about it? I imagine you’re part of some religious group and you’d hope that through said group, you’d at least learn and practice some empathy?

8 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What a sad realization. I’d like to say thank you for the update but it feels too bad, sorry.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Taxpayers clearly lose money through the treasury though. I think you may have a bias view here for some reason but the job of the fed reserve is just to “settle” the shortcomings over time. That doesn’t mean there aren’t real losses or gains, they’re just moved around to create more “stability”. Money lost is money lost and if the taxpayers fund it then they lose the money while these banks/fed owners/members are guaranteed no losses.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don’t think you understand what you’re saying. Firstly, if the US military did in fact carry out this kidnapping with the precision and force we are told it did, then the Geneva conventions will certainly apply - how the Venezuelan president is now treated will dictate any such violations. Secondly, police forces don’t lawfully act in foreign sovereign bodies unless they are expressly granted jurisdiction … which in this case the US was not. This kidnapping certainly violates laws and treaties

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0