1829 pts ยท January 28, 2014
I mine solo.
Many people aren't comfortable enough or frank enough with their partner to actually talk about what's going on
My family also owned slaves. If I ever met their descendents, I would absolutely apologize. My ancestors did bad things.
That is completely and utterly false.
Semantics. Most people create favorable impressions by being decent people, not resorting to emotional manipulation.
As opposed to, you know, treating a woman like a fucking human being.
Because that's the important thing? Psychologically tricking women into responding favorably to you?
Oh, the toolbox of manipulating women into fucking you? The fact that you use "tools" for that makes you, yourself, quite the fucking tool.
Dedicated to the process of learning how better to manipulate a woman into having sex with you? Explain how that isn't fucked up.
XKCD said it well: "Pickup artists are dehumanizing creeps who see relationships as adversarial and women as sex toys."
what
Based on, you know, hard data. And a few studies. Okay, a lot of studies.
Yeah, but smart people often *tend* to have high IQs. And smart people *tend* to be well educated. Not always, but often.
It's an interesting misconception, that quotation marks lend emphasis. Kind of sad in this instance.
this thread got very gross very fast
Ah, so your comment meant to say, "don't make femininity more negative than it is already perceived to be".
(4/4) At this point, I'm not sure men *need* to assert that they're equal to women.
(3/4) ...since the purpose of explicit celebrations, at least in feminism, is to assert that yes, women are equal to men.
(2/3) One could argue that implicit celebrations are all a dominant gender "needs" or "deserves"...
That's intriguing... I think explicit celebrations of men do tend to be viewed negatively. (1/2)
(3/3) ...rather than hurting them.
(2/?) Everyone experiences prejudice & stereotypes. I think zulators's saying that historical stereotypes mainly benefit men...
I would argue that is equal or similar to the amount of shaming/blaming that women experience. Stereotypes & prejudice are everywhere. (1/?)
They may be feminists. They may even call themselves feminists. In this case, all we know is they were madly jumping to conclusions.
Yes. Yes, that's allowed. Go ahead!
They're probably free of all the gross bacteria that ends up in your mouth, too.
Well that's bizarre
These are people, not animals...
Need for madness
Hmm. Well, my knowledge is anecdotal. Both of my androids have been lower-tier and both happened to have at least FM.
You're correct, it does not. It's a completely different technology and very short range.
Many people aren't comfortable enough or frank enough with their partner to actually talk about what's going on
My family also owned slaves. If I ever met their descendents, I would absolutely apologize. My ancestors did bad things.
That is completely and utterly false.
Semantics. Most people create favorable impressions by being decent people, not resorting to emotional manipulation.
As opposed to, you know, treating a woman like a fucking human being.
Because that's the important thing? Psychologically tricking women into responding favorably to you?
Oh, the toolbox of manipulating women into fucking you? The fact that you use "tools" for that makes you, yourself, quite the fucking tool.
Dedicated to the process of learning how better to manipulate a woman into having sex with you? Explain how that isn't fucked up.
XKCD said it well: "Pickup artists are dehumanizing creeps who see relationships as adversarial and women as sex toys."
what
Based on, you know, hard data. And a few studies. Okay, a lot of studies.
Yeah, but smart people often *tend* to have high IQs. And smart people *tend* to be well educated. Not always, but often.
It's an interesting misconception, that quotation marks lend emphasis. Kind of sad in this instance.
this thread got very gross very fast
Ah, so your comment meant to say, "don't make femininity more negative than it is already perceived to be".
(4/4) At this point, I'm not sure men *need* to assert that they're equal to women.
(3/4) ...since the purpose of explicit celebrations, at least in feminism, is to assert that yes, women are equal to men.
(2/3) One could argue that implicit celebrations are all a dominant gender "needs" or "deserves"...
That's intriguing... I think explicit celebrations of men do tend to be viewed negatively. (1/2)
(3/3) ...rather than hurting them.
(2/?) Everyone experiences prejudice & stereotypes. I think zulators's saying that historical stereotypes mainly benefit men...
I would argue that is equal or similar to the amount of shaming/blaming that women experience. Stereotypes & prejudice are everywhere. (1/?)
They may be feminists. They may even call themselves feminists. In this case, all we know is they were madly jumping to conclusions.
Yes. Yes, that's allowed. Go ahead!
They're probably free of all the gross bacteria that ends up in your mouth, too.
Well that's bizarre
These are people, not animals...
Need for madness
Hmm. Well, my knowledge is anecdotal. Both of my androids have been lower-tier and both happened to have at least FM.
You're correct, it does not. It's a completely different technology and very short range.