uber08

-8 pts · February 10, 2014


As such a miserable bastard, to me it’s about the contrast with nature. Painted/papered walls also felt so artificial in way. The monochrome walls are too, but it’s not really pretending to be anything else. Then when you look out the window, you have the natural beauty of everything else to take in with all the vibrant color.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Elken Ring

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*Ric Flair

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so this is fine, but when i get called bigdicknick by a 2-year-old suddenly there is a warrant out for my arrest. double standards :(

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Dude, those are tortoises...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to mind trademark infringement claims. it's almost like a hybrid response. that being said, proving copying may be expensive/hard (2/2).

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

well the strange part is the bit about "a significant part of the population..." as it's not really relevant to them copying. it calls (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Instructions unclear: bought shoes bright enough to illuminate the whole of continental Africa.

12 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'll have what he's having.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plot twist: she just started reading the Harry Potter series.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

tell that to miley

12 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

conservation doesn't seem to be implicated or even tested here.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Isn't this just more about what she believes fairness is? To her it's about number of units as opposed to the amount of cracker so

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

likely the alleged infringing use would interfere with the trademark holder's use of the original mark.

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Even in deciding if something is a "parody" or not in TM law, courts tend to look at how close the marks are and how

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Given the similarity of the marks and the products/goods to which they are attached, overcoming the "fair use" defense shouldn't be too hard

12 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

under TM law, you'd still be liable to suit for infringement.

12 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1