This is why Hermione is my spirit animal

Feb 28, 2015 11:56 AM

Grangerdanger

Views

526658

Likes

7440

Dislikes

337

This Tumblr post annoys me - Hermione was 8/9 when Matilda came out

tumblr

harry_potter

ciclejerk

funny

If you're going to psychoanalyze a character, you need evidence, just like you would in a psychoanalysis of a real person.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I'd take Fred and George over Hermione any time. Those guys were the Bill Gates of Hogwarts: blowing off classes to invent new things.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

instead of being your spirit animal why not your patronus?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tumble, stating the plainly obvious and being praised as being insightful

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I always loved her, and always will.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Good grief I absolutely hate when posts start with "can we just..."

11 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

Can we just stop starting posts with can we just?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can we just take a moment to appreciate this guys good grief?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

RAGEUPVOTE. [/RAGEQUIT]

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Spirit animals have feelings too.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm just gonna leave this here: http://karakamos.tumblr.com/post/78248413978/okay-okay-im-going-to-tell-you-what-hermione

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I love that post so fuckin much, it puts into words everything I disliked about movie hermione.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thank. Fucking. You. I was looking for this in screenshot form.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's slightly incorrect. Even in the books Hermione was also Harry's conscience. Her portrayal in the movies is not exactly wrong.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i think the most unbelievable thing is that the wizard's government recruits the best and the brightest, not the most well connected wizards

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

ahh now where is that post about movie Hermione taking movie Ron's best qualities?

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Don't know if I know about that, but MovieRon was so much lamer than BookRon. Sad.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Anyone have the source?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd take Fred and George over Hermione any time. Those guys were the Bill Gates of Hogwarts: blowing off classes to invent new things.

11 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 3

They also enchanted snowballs to hit Voldemort in the face. Repeatedly.

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Shit, they're the Bill Gates and Steve Jobs (with a dash of Steve Wozniak) of the Wizarding world

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Gred & Forge forever!

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

One of them wasn't forever.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

You are a horrible person.

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I'm in love with a mudblood.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh gosh that Matilda one was precious

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

+1 because punched Draco in the face.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

In the book, she actually slaps him! They changed it to a punch in the movie.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As much as I prefer the books, I kinda prefer the punch.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I would enjoy all the HP tumblr posts alot more if they didnt base them on stills from the movies, usually with stuff thats not in the books

11 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 1

Or if they didn't just make shit up and stopped overreacting to everything.

11 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

-1 for "spirit animal"

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

11 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Holy shit tumblr makes me cringe

11 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 17

Well it is an echo chamber of fans

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I really hate that they took away all her character flaws in the movie, and gave her a bunch of Ron's good qualities.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be fair, Punching drako in the face is beyond awesome.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

HOW COULD ANYONE DOWNVOTE THIS?

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 14

Too many MRA dudes on imgur

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't, but probably because tumblr.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Because it's mostly self assuring bullshit cobbled together by over enthusiastic 12 year olds from spare bits of dialogue and logic 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

All wrapped up and presented to us as amazingly revolutionary, epiphany level thinking when really all they're doing is figuring out 2/3

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Godanm plotlines /rant 3/3

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

because it's over-analyzing movie-Hermione, and movie-Hermione has no flaws

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I have seen one of the movies and read none of the books ... still upvoted.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I'm for all three of them. :) Harry Potter, Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley are the best when they are together.

11 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 4

Same, love all 3 characters. I really empathized most with Ron and Hermione though, they both have huge parts of my personality in them.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#3 is also the hot DJ from Pitch Perfect, fun fact

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Pitch Perfect reference in a comment section of a Harry Potter (specifically Hermoine) post? These are a few of my favorite things.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tumblr really has mastered the art of looking too much into things, haven't they?

11 years ago | Likes 365 Dislikes 19

It's been a nerd stereotype for decades. Welcome to fandom.

11 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

sometimes, but I wouldn't really say so in this case.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

This is why I refuse to be part of a "fandom"

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Fans, in general, are guilty of that. Tumblr just provides posting grounds.

11 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 0

Yea feminism being one of them.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Yeah. "Her real fear is rejection and loss." Then the boggart would be rejection and loss JFC

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I get irrationally angry when people use the movies as canon. Read the books and 90% of "crazy moments" in the movies are explained.

11 years ago | Likes 674 Dislikes 3

Seriously! They are are so worth the read!

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

not the time when she puched draco in the face

11 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 4

One of the very few moments which is better in the film than the book.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You need to be explained why someone would feel the urge or reason to punch Draco Malfoy in the face?

11 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

He really does have a punchable face

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Dude If i could get them i would have read them like at least 20 times by now..

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Prisons have the Harry Potter novels. Where the heck do you live?

11 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

I live in Pakistan, the novels were very expensive here because 1 USD = 100 Pakistani Rupees so that's why i can't get them.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What do you live in the glorious democratic people's republic of Korea?

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I live in Pakistan, the novels were very expensive here because 1 USD = 100 Pakistani Rupees so that's why i can't get them.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Damn....

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Careful, ilovepikachu is IRL the assistant to Kim Jong Un. His assistant number Un. (sorry)

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You should put the "IRL" after "Kim Jung Un." Right now it reads "...ilovepikachu is in real life the assistant to Kim Jung Un." ......sorry

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

English is only my third language so often my syntax is off, and is closer to that of my own language :)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you just put comma's around "IRL" it becomes a perfectly acceptable sentence.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Still can't get over the rewriting of the wands in the last movies. Is it so hard to show 10 sec of Harrys wand being kept and repaired?

11 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 0

Oh my God i know.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That made me SO MAD. The way it was in the books was wonderful and symbolic and wise. In the movie he just threw it away. Effin stupid.

11 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Getting rid of the massively symbolic face off between Expelliarmus and Avada Kedavra bummed me out a lot

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Movies should hold all of their own. They're different stories, the movies and the books.

11 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 6

One of the big problems with the Harry Potter movies actually - they tried to be too true to the books and just screwed everything up.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

this is why Game of Thrones is such a great adaptation of The Song of Ice and Fire.

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yet many get annoyed when GoT strays from ASoIaF, it's just a natural reaction when expectations aren't met.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Like the later books, they're victims of Rowling's success.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I was looking for this comment. I actually get annoyed watching the movies.

11 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

Soooo many stupid pointless changes.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Studying magic actually sounds pretty boring. Like chemistry meets computer programming.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

yeah once the novelty's worn off i'd be w/ harry

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Who did Hermione keep alive in a jar? I honestly don't remember that.

11 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

I've read these books several times and I still don't remember that...I'm so glad you asked the question, too!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It wasn't in the movies. She kept Rita Skeeter in a jar to keep her quiet. If I remember I correctly I think it was to protect Harry?

11 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

yeah, then she used her in the next book to write an article for the Quibbler

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Right! Thanks! It's been a while since I've read them so my memory's a bit fuzzy. :)

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

not just to protect Harry but to stop Rita from writing all those nasty and untrue articles about anything

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Oh right. Yeah, I read all the books but haven't looked at them for years. Thanks!

11 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Haha! It's been a while for me too! :)

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

guick google search reveals this was Rita Skeeter in Goblet of Fire. Kept her in beetle form in the jar.

11 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Rita Skeeter, but I don't think it was for a whole year...

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Am I the only one that thinks that most people are honestly just overthinking things? What if like, the author didn't even give a shit...

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I know I'm not the only one who tried moving things with my mind when I was a six year old girl reading Matilda.

11 years ago | Likes 1177 Dislikes 2

I tried turning the light off without having to get out of bed. One time, the light actually went out, but it was only because a fuse blew.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I watched bedknobs and broomsticks. Treguna mecoides trecorum satis dee.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What do you mean 6 years old?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1) a few years ago, after all those power rangers and martial arts shows,

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2) i trained untill i could throw a punch and use the air to flick out a candle flame a two feet away

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I watched the movie and i was tryin' that shit.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I tried it. I summoned all the bullshit and anger to the top of my head and tried t move shit with it.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's weird I thought I was having a phonecall.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm a 27 year old man and I still do it from time to time.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

30 year old man, still try on occasion.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Christ, I still tried when I was rereading it as a 25-year old boy. (Last week.)

11 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 0

When I was young I would watch water streaming off my finger tips. I'd stretch my hand out and try to shoot it like a waterbender lol. (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I actually thought the only thing keeping myself and others from doing magic was truly believing and tried to force myself to believe. (2/2)

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I didn't even have Matilda, just power hungry ambition. I still swear to this day that I moved an empty coke can.

11 years ago | Likes 175 Dislikes 0

I was still trying at 16. Only by then I was trying to use the force.

11 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

I'm turning 36 in two months and I just tried. The day I stop you can shoot me.

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Hermione would have just turned nine when Matilda was published. She could have read it a year before going to Hogwarts!

11 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

All of you still do this at red lights, every last person reading this.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Joke's on you. I don't drive.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I was reading Carrie. >.>

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I am 100% sure I caused a power outage with my mind once

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

We all did. But for me the catalyst was Luke Skywalker.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I still do.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was arguing with someone once and they made me mad, a bookshelf randomly almost fell on top of them. just missed. Argument stopped tho

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One day I'll figure it out...one of these days...

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I used to have dreams where I would move a paper clip, then a pencil, but I could never do anything else and it frustrated me so much.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same but I was a boy

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

at some point I gave up and settled on being robin hood. That one worked out much better.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Man. I tried sayian shit all the time

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When you were 6? Try decades later when I'm feeling lazy.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My first top comment. Thanks, people.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I remember before I started going to school, I got to see the movie with my dad. I promised to myself that I would defeat the principal.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I did that when I was a six year old girl and I'm a guy.

11 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

A lot of people can do wandless magic. There's a class on it at Hogwarts.

11 years ago | Likes 944 Dislikes 26

Wandless magic classes only happen in the last two years of their hogwarts life

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think you mean the nonverbal spells. iirc wandless magic is very rare (in the books), but hermione probs had her wand w/ her in that scene

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nonverbal spells was indeed the class I confused it with, but wandless magic isn't unheard of. You don't need to be Dumbledore to do it.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wands actually just focus the magic, making it easier to cast a spell. That's why Harry could explode that glass in PoA. Magic just went 1/?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

hogwire (though also there was no spell). To focus magic, you have to make a signature movement with your want. In this case, Hermoine 2/?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

did not preform the movement so she had to focus the magic without shortcuts. Which is special. Though not as special as worldess magic. 3/3

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was this scene even in the books?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think it's a scene that they describe rather than one we see happen, so the detail of her using a wand or not isn't included.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Isn't the class about wordless magic, not wandless?

11 years ago | Likes 99 Dislikes 0

a real wizard can summon death with three small sticks and 4 cc of mouse blood or even with a fresh egg and two small sticks

11 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

But it has to be fresh.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is that all? hell, the other day, I used a prick of blood and a /toothpick/. Granted, all i summoned was a runty imp, but still!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The rite of AshkEnte!

11 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Yay Discworld!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also if you can do things simpler by just watching a very old man with a terminal illness. Carrot style!

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Wait, which book was that in?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Short story, theatre of cruelty

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hell wasn't there a gif of some guy stiring his tea magically, without a wand that the internet was all over?

11 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

Yeah, but that's Ian Brown from the Stone Roses. He is the resurrection.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There sure was.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Wizards can put charms on things so they don't need wands. Remember

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Molly's dishes cleaning themselves?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There was another tumblr post about how that guy "must be the best wizard ever" because of the wandless magic and reading Hawking's book 1/?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When in reality, a shit ton of people do wandless magic all the time. Snape and Quirrel, for example during that Quidditch match and 2/3

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tumblr just keeps forgetting that wandless magic isn't a big deal 3/3

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yea. But that was also because he was reading a Stephen hawking physics book.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

good point, i forgot about the book.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Every time this guy is mentioned, I feel compelled to mention Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality. http://hpmor.com/

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

In short, Harry grew up with a chemistry professor as adoptive father, and is reasonably familiar with rational thinking

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

and the scientific method. The final arc of the story is currently being published, DO NOT SKIP AHEAD, it will seriously spoil the fun.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

also, she had her wand on her other hand under the view of everyone, what do they expect she showing the wand to everyone? jeez

11 years ago | Likes 131 Dislikes 0

EXACTLY. Doing wandless magic wasn't hard. They're mixing it up with doing magic with a wand but without saying anything.

11 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I think wandless magic on purpose was hard in the books, like when harry's paralyzed but can't summon his wand. but hermione still had hers

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

THANK YOU

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

people dont realize that all wizards can do wandless magic. wands act like a sort of focusing lens for magic.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The book and movie universes differ on wandless magic continuity. Most likely the latter taking liberties for visual interest.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wasn't one of the first times they think Snape is trying to kill harry because they see him muttering a 'hex' under his breath? No wand?

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

snape did it while performing a counter spell on professor quirrel...and quirrel was also doing wandless magic at the same time

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Harry himself did it, using Lumos to find his wand after dropping it.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A wand is only a concentration mechanism.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Is it only for women?

11 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

This comment is so clever. Wonderfully done.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Doesnt she have her wand in her other hand?

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If you think about it, Harry did wandless magic before coming to Hogwarts, like making the glass disappear so his snake friend could escape.

11 years ago | Likes 445 Dislikes 4

In the books is said that a lot of kids do magic by themselves, if you are born muggle you don't know what it is or why it happened.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

'Thanksssssssss' - snake friend

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Isn't his "snake friend" Nigini? Voldemorts horcrux snake?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Has everyone forgotten that Harry blew up his aunt without a wand?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's like shooting wildly into the sky, accidentally hitting someone in the head, then claiming to be a master sniper.

11 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

360 no scope

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Amateur. *performs 720 YY Fakie Ladderstall cross the map throwing knife round ending kill cam in search and destroy* *signs up for faze*

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*ollies*

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He also couldn't find his wand in the dark once so he illuminated it to find it

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

11 years ago (deleted Mar 1, 2015 3:16 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Granted, doing specific spells on purpose without a wand is apparently really hard, but it's fairly common high-level magic.

11 years ago | Likes 174 Dislikes 0

a real wizard can summon death with three small sticks and 4 cc of mouse blood or even with a fresh egg and two small sticks

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I never got why, if wands are so utterly crucial, they didn't have them permanently attached to their forearms.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, this has always irked me. I don't know where the idea started that wandless magic is such a big deal, but the books clearly illustrate

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

that it's difficult and advanced, but definitely doable and even common for simpler spells.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I get so annoyed when people only watch the movies and freak out about stuff that is explained in the books.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I don't know about that, but don't forget this guy:

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's what I call my magic if my wand fails me.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, "lots" is a stretch, but these people are obviously not familiar with the books and only look at the movie. SHE HAS THE WAND IN HER/2

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

HAND IN THAT SCENE AS WELL. SHE FUCKING PULLS IT OUT2/2

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Has everyone forgotten that Harry blew up his aunt without a wand?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

he also wandlessly opened a locked door to get to his wand (and trunk) when he was trying to run away after blowing up his aunt

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm really angry that this comment has so many points on a site that should know better. There is no wandless magic class at Hogwarts.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You're right, I confused the class with silent magic. Still, a lot of people can do wandless magic.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Part of the DADA class in 6th year introduces wordless spells which is then incorporated into other classes.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In Ch. 11 Book 6, “Nonverbal spells were now expected, not only in Defense Against the Dark Arts, but in Charms and Transfiguration too."

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All wizards and witches can do magic without a wand, it's just a magical artifact to channel wizards magic through making is more precise

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

what about that post where the dude is stirring coffee w no hands or wands reading stephen hawking, saying how hes so powerful cuz no wand?

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

This one? Not really accurate, IIRC. Wandless magic is hard, but he's really not the only one to use it.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yup, thats the one

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, there isn't.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I was mistaken about the class. Plenty of people can cast wandless magic, though.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not "plenty". Most wizarding children do it accidentally, but purposeful wandless magic in students and adults is rarely in the books.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

From what I remember Snape, Lupin, Dumbledore, and Harry all pull it off (though Harry does so badly under unusual circumstances).

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And I think the fact that basically all wizard children do it before they get wands still counts.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But I don't remember much wandless magic from books .... Like, everything about it is from the movies :/

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Has everyone forgotten that Harry blew up his aunt without a wand?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah but all wizards started magic sometimes, and then they had to learn to use it. What he did was when he was REALLY angry..

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

he also wandlessly opened a locked door to get to his wand when he was trying to run away after blowing up his aunt

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think the closest harry ever gets is his wand lighting a few inches from his fingertips when he says lumos. But he's scared in that scene

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Look at the source, the books, and take examples from that. Please.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most of the wandless magic I can remember right now, comes from emotional scenes; and from wizard kids before they started chool :l

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Taking Hermione potentially doing wandless magic in this scene and saying it's proof of how powerful she is, is a bit of exaggeration.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

True, I don't remember the scene in the books at all >.<

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As far as I remember, we don't actually see it. It's from Harry's perspective and Hermione just admits it later.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not everything. It's more prominent in the movies, but it's in the books too. Though I was wrong about there being a class.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah but in the movies, there's like a whole lot. Guess I'll have to re-read books to see how much of it is in the actual story :/

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not nearly as much as in the movies, you're right there. It

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*it's just implied that it's very hard to do, but not reserved to only the greatest of wizards. Lupin can do it, I think.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hmmm. yeaaah, i will HAVE to read the books again xD

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wandless magic is actually pretty much a no-no in the books. They just put it in the movies for some reason

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Has everyone forgotten that Harry blew up his aunt without a wand?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No it isn't. There isn't a class (I was wrong about that) and it's very difficult, but people do it. Snape and Lupin come to mind.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0